Home » Entertainment » Frank Pé and *Zoo*: The Creation of a Comic Masterpiece

Frank Pé and *Zoo*: The Creation of a Comic Masterpiece

Frank Pé: ‌A Legacy Forged in Respect and Realism

Frank Pé, now 69, built his celebrated career on ⁤a foundation⁤ of deep artistic respect and ⁤a commitment to​ matching style to substance. His‌ groundbreaking collaboration with ‌Philippe Bonifay on ⁤the series⁢ Zoo exemplifies this approach, born from ⁢a chance meeting at‌ a comic festival in maubeuge around 1987-1988. The initial connection blossomed⁣ into frequent festival encounters, shared studio visits, and ultimately, the ‍ambitious project of Zoo. Pé was ‌particularly drawn to​ the literary and poetic qualities of Bonifay’s earlier work, The Chariot of ⁣Thespis, believing Bonifay possessed a unique talent for character psychology, while Pé felt he could⁢ best realize the story’s narrative potential.

The visual world of Zoo is richly layered ⁢with artistic influence. The ‍character of Buggy, a central figure in the series, draws inspiration from both animal sculptor Rembrandt Bugatti -⁢ brother of automobile manufacturer hector Bugatti – and the early-dying German painter Egon ‌Schiele.⁢ Pé incorporated numerous sculptures by Rembrandt Bugatti, including depictions of a mandrill and a stretched panther, directly into the artwork. Both Bugatti ​and Schiele, who⁤ tragically died by suicide at the ⁣age of thirty-two, resonated with Pé as figures marked ⁣by ⁢early loss. The architecture of the ⁤Antwerp Zoo served as a ‍key visual reference ⁢for the Norman zoo depicted in Zoo.

Originally conceived as a diptych ‌of 110 pages intended for quick release‌ alongside Free Flight, Zoo‘s trajectory shifted as Bonifay observed audience engagement. He expanded the narrative,‍ introducing the storyline of Célestin’s⁣ decision to ⁤dedicate his ‌medical skills to humans ​rather than ⁣animals. Bonifay credits a visit to Antwerp Zoo with sparking the creation of the core ‌characters – Manon, Anna, ⁣Buggy, and Célestin‍ – a rare instance where characters emerged before a fully formed plot. Pé himself later described the zoo itself as a fifth character ⁣in the story.The emotional impact of the⁤ series is evident ‌in Pé’s admission of tears shed ​upon ⁣reading Bonifay’s screenplay, specifically the passage detailing Célestin’s⁢ death at the front lines in the third part – a planned narrative beat that Bonifay approached with relative ease.

Crucially, ⁣Pé​ consciously chose a realistic ⁢drawing style for Zoo, a deliberate departure from ‍his more ‌cartoonish work ⁤like Ragebol. He felt the gravity of the story – a ⁢tale of a ⁤woman grappling with profound loss – demanded a more sensitive and nuanced visual approach.He specifically avoided⁣ the exaggerated features characteristic ​of the work of André Franquin, a cartoonist he deeply admired.Pé held Franquin in the highest regard, stating​ in a 2016 interview:⁤ “Ther is a kind of warmth in his universe, a generosity, a bliss, but also⁤ a perfection that you don’t see anywhere ⁤else. It is difficult to describe, but when you read a Franquin, you ⁣instantly feel that ‍there is so much more behind those drawings.​ Now I⁢ know that this is simply the person ⁣of Franquin himself.‍ He was really unique. (…) Franquin is my drawing father.” This admiration, notably, was reciprocated by Franquin himself, a testament to Pé’s talent ⁢and artistic integrity.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.