Home » Health » -title Paris Mother Receives Increased Compensation for Spinal Cord Injury After Cesarean

-title Paris Mother Receives Increased Compensation for Spinal Cord Injury After Cesarean

by Dr. Michael Lee – Health Editor

Paris⁤ Court Upholds⁣ Partial Compensation for Mother Paralyzed During Childbirth

Paris, France – A⁣ Paris administrative ‍court has ruled in favor of a mother who suffered ⁤paralysis‌ in ​both legs following a complication during​ a cesarean section, though the awarded compensation remains significantly less than she sought. The ruling, dated ‍September 23, 2025, and recently​ made public, details the woman’s legal battle with Oniam, ​the French association responsible for compensating victims of medical accidents when establishing liability of healthcare ‌providers proves difficult.

The mother experienced an “extraordinary complication ⁢of the perimedullary ⁤anesthesia” administered during childbirth,resulting in a spinal ⁤cord injury and permanent functional deficit estimated at over 60%. She initially requested ⁣a “provision” of 150,000 euros to cover future⁣ compensation for her ⁢damages. ​A summary judge initially awarded 45,056⁤ euros in September 2024, a⁣ figure both parties appealed. Oniam offered ‍a ‍maximum of 32,000 ⁣euros.

The court of ‌appeal ultimately increased the “provision” to ⁤49,118.56 euros, acknowledging the‍ “conditions of ⁢abnormality and seriousness”⁤ of the injury and⁤ establishing Oniam’s liability.‌

The awarded funds are ⁢intended to help cover the costs​ of adaptive equipment, ⁣including a​ wheelchair, a standing chair, a bath lift, ⁤and a terrace access ramp, all documented in an occupational therapist’s report. However, the court denied compensation for “purchases of protections and wipes” ‍related to vesico-sphincter‍ disorders, citing insufficient documentation -⁣ only ‍a single receipt was provided.

Further complicating the⁤ mother’s situation is her housing. Following her delivery,⁣ she was initially hospitalized for over a year. Upon returning home in February 2023, she found her family’s 18th-floor apartment lacked an elevator and was otherwise unsuitable⁣ for a person with ⁣a disability, necessitating ongoing third-party assistance. The court‍ acknowledged the ⁣need for this assistance.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.