Home » Sport » Title: Brandin Cooks Joins Bills, Questions Arise Over Saints’ Contract Maneuvers

Title: Brandin Cooks Joins Bills, Questions Arise Over Saints’ Contract Maneuvers

by Alex Carter - Sports Editor

Bills‘ New receiver ⁢Brandin Cooks Praises Organization,Circumstances of Arrival ⁣Remain Murky

ORCHARD ⁤PARK,NY – Newly acquired Buffalo Bills wide ‌receiver⁢ Brandin Cooks expressed gratitude for the⁢ opportunity ⁤to play with quarterback Josh⁢ Allen and lauded the Bills​ organization,but questions surrounding his departure ‌from the New Orleans Saints and the NFL’s handling ⁣of related ‌contract rules persist. ⁤Cooks spoke positively about the Bills following his signing, stating, “He’s a special ​player. All you do is ⁤hear about this organization⁢ from afar being a special place, and how‌ they treat players. it’s all about ball. So I’m thankful to ⁤be ‌here, for sure.”

Cooks’ arrival in Buffalo followed‌ a complex⁤ series of contract revisions⁤ and his willingness to forfeit $2.11 million from his Saints ‌deal. The circumstances raise ⁤questions about whether⁣ Cooks knew a deal with the⁢ Bills was imminent when he relinquished the funds, and if his agent⁣ engaged ⁤in direct negotiations with Buffalo prior⁣ to his release. Central to the situation is ‍a league rule ⁤that appears to have been circumvented regarding a team’s ability to alter a contract specifically to deter ‌another team from claiming a player ⁣on waivers.

The Saints initially revised Cooks’ contract, increasing​ a 2026 guarantee from $1.69 million to⁤ $5.94 million,⁤ a ⁤move seemingly designed to discourage other teams from claiming him. this ⁢revision was subsequently ⁢voided⁢ to comply with a rule preventing‍ such deterrent tactics. However, the Saints then waived Cooks, perhaps violating another rule prohibiting ‍a waiver‍ following an attempt to deter a waiver claim. ‍

The NFL has declined ‍to comment on⁤ four requests for clarification regarding the situation. Sources suggest the⁤ league’s silence⁢ stems from concerns that enforcing ​the rule against the Saints could open​ the door to a collusion‌ case ‍filed by the NFL Players Association, as ⁣the rules in question​ are‌ not part of the ⁣Collective Bargaining Agreement. This outcome has reportedly prompted inquiries from other ⁤teams questioning ⁤the purpose of having rules if ⁢they are not consistently enforced.

Cooks acknowledged the complexities⁢ of the situation, stating, “The Saints organization, absolutely⁣ unbelievable in this process…looking ⁢out for⁢ me. Trying to ‍help me be able to⁤ make⁣ that decision. and so​ at ‌the end of the day, it’s part of it, right? There’s rules, and⁤ we didn’t know.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.