Home » News » Judge Denies Tulsa Woman’s Request in Oklahoma Survivors’ Act Case

Judge Denies Tulsa Woman’s Request in Oklahoma Survivors’ Act Case

by David Harrison – Chief Editor

Judge⁤ Denies April Wilkens’ Request for Reconsideration Under Oklahoma Survivors’ Act

TULSA, OKLA. ‌(KTUL) – A Tulsa County judge has denied April ⁢Wilkens’ motion to reconsider his previous decision denying her sentencing relief, and also rejected⁤ a request for a new hearing under the Oklahoma Survivors Act,⁤ according to‌ recently filed court documents.

District Judge⁤ David Guten, in‌ a 17-page order, affirmed that while wilkens qualifies as ‍a ⁣survivor of domestic violence under Oklahoma law, she ⁣did ​not present sufficient evidence to modify ⁤her life sentence. wilkens was convicted of⁢ first-degree murder in ‍1999 for ⁣the 1998 killing of ⁤her former fiancé, Terry Carlton.

The Oklahoma Survivors’ Act, enacted in 2024, permits individuals ⁢convicted of crimes who are also domestic violence survivors to petition for sentence modifications if‍ they can demonstrate ⁣the abuse played a considerable role in⁣ the offense.

wilkens’ case has garnered meaningful attention as a prominent example under the new ⁢law, which allows for​ the re-examination of cases ‌involving long-term abuse.So far, only one person in Oklahoma has received relief under the ⁤statute: Lisa Rae Wright, who was resentenced and released earlier this year.

Judge Guten’s order⁤ acknowledges ​that ‍Wilkens​ “established by ‌clear and convincing evidence that she is a‌ survivor⁤ of domestic violence perpetrated ‍by decedent Terry ⁢Carlton.” The judge cited evidence ⁤of⁢ “physical injuries on numerous occasions,” ⁢including documented ⁤bruising and vaginal tears from two separate ⁣Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) exams, alongside trial⁢ testimony and exhibits detailing abuse within ⁣the relationship, finding “more than sufficient evidence” of abuse. However, the order​ clarifies this finding represents only one aspect ⁤of the required analysis.

Despite recognizing Wilkens as a ‍survivor, Guten ruled she failed to prove ⁢the abuse substantially contributed to the ⁢homicide, as mandated⁢ by the Act. The order ⁤points to concerns⁣ regarding⁢ expert testimony,inconsistencies in ⁢accounts,and a lack of corroborating evidence beyond ⁣Wilkens’ own statements.

The court also denied ‌Wilkens’ request to disqualify the Tulsa County District Attorney’s office‍ and appoint a special prosecutor.

An evidentiary hearing in Wilkens’ case was held⁢ in early ⁤September, with ​further filings submitted in the⁣ weeks following.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.