Home » World » Here are a few options for a concise SEO title, considering the article’s content: **Option 1 (Most Comprehensive):** * **Lammy Proposes Ending Jury Trials for Many Crimes in UK Courts** **Option 2 (Focus on Impact):** * **UK Justice Reform: Could

Here are a few options for a concise SEO title, considering the article’s content: **Option 1 (Most Comprehensive):** * **Lammy Proposes Ending Jury Trials for Many Crimes in UK Courts** **Option 2 (Focus on Impact):** * **UK Justice Reform: Could

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

Justice​ Secretary Proposes Scrapping Jury Trials for Most Cases Amid Court Backlog

The UK Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is ‌considering a proposal to⁤ eliminate jury trials in ​most criminal cases,⁣ a ​move ⁣intended⁢ to address a important ⁢backlog ⁤in ⁣the court system. ⁤As of the latest figures, 78,000 ​cases ‍are currently awaiting trial, a number that continues to​ rise.

While the ‍MoJ maintains “no ‌final ⁤decision ‍has been ​taken,” a‍ spokesperson stated that “bold action” is needed to resolve the “crisis” ⁣causing “pain and anguish to ⁣victims.” The​ plan would see judges decide verdicts ⁣in the majority of cases, rather ‍than a panel of jurors.

The proposal has drawn swift ⁢and widespread criticism‍ from⁢ legal ‌professionals ‌and political opponents. Riel Karmy-Jones ⁢KC,chair of the Criminal bar Association,dismissed the idea as ineffective,stating,”What ⁣they propose ⁤simply ‍won’t work – ⁢it⁢ is indeed ‌not the‍ magic ‍pill that they promise…the consequences of ‍their actions will be ⁣to destroy a criminal justice system that has been the pride of this country for‍ centuries,and to‌ destroy justice⁢ as we certainly know it.” Karmy-Jones‌ attributed ⁣the‌ backlog⁣ to “systematic underfunding and neglect” by successive governments.

Conservative ⁤Party leader Kemi Badenoch criticized the plans on X (formerly ‌Twitter), arguing they “risks fairness,⁣ undermines public trust, and erodes ‍the very foundation of our justice system.” Badenoch affirmed the ‍Conservative party’s support for “trial by jury.”

Liberal Democrat justice spokesperson‍ Jess brown-Fuller MP labeled the plans “wholly disgraceful,” accusing the ⁣government of ⁢”dismantling our justice ​system and ⁤failing victims.” ‍She called for the government to “reconsider” the proposal‌ “as a matter ⁤of urgency.”

Former​ judge Wendy Joseph​ KC described ‍the proposal as an “absolutely essential change” to UK justice principles,​ adding that‌ many judges ⁤would be “uncomfortable” with sole duty for verdicts.

Baroness Helena Kennedy, a Scottish Barrister and Labor Peer, argued that juries act as “a valve on the system” and that public participation ‌in courtrooms is “a vital ⁤proponent” of justice, especially given “a‍ crisis of trust in all our​ institutions.”

Lord Charles ‍Falconer, a former ‌justice secretary and Labour peer, highlighted the importance of public faith in the system’s ability ⁣to correctly ⁣convict the guilty and acquit‌ the innocent, noting that a lack of clarity in acquittals erodes trust.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.