Slovenia Rejects Assisted Suicide Legalization in National Referendum
Ljubljana, Slovenia – Slovenian voters narrowly rejected a referendum to legalize assisted suicide for the terminally ill and those suffering from incurable conditions, results confirmed Sunday. The “no” vote prevailed with 39% support against 31% for the “yes” vote,with the remaining votes invalid. The outcome halts the planned implementation of a law passed by parliament earlier this year that would have allowed individuals facing unbearable suffering to request medical assistance in ending their lives.
The referendum result throws the future of end-of-life care legislation in Slovenia into uncertainty. Prime Minister Robert Golob, a proponent of the law, had argued that individuals should have the right to “decide for ourselves how and with what dignity we end our lives.” However, opponents, led by the catholic Church, framed the legislation as a violation of fundamental principles, asserting it contradicted “the Gospel, natural law and human dignity.” The vote underscores deep societal divisions on the sensitive issue, mirroring debates unfolding across Europe.
The proposed law would have permitted assisted suicide for adults with a diagnosed terminal illness or incurable condition causing unbearable suffering, subject to strict medical and psychological evaluations. Several European nations already have similar legislation in place, including Switzerland, Austria, the Netherlands, Belgium, and luxembourg.France is currently considering a similar measure, with President Emmanuel Macron suggesting a referendum if parliamentary progress stalls.
The rejection in Slovenia follows a campaign marked by intense ethical and religious arguments. Opponents raised concerns about potential coercion of vulnerable individuals, while supporters emphasized the importance of individual autonomy and compassionate end-of-life options.The result leaves Slovenia outside the growing number of European countries offering legal pathways for assisted dying, and signals a potential setback for proponents of such legislation within the country.
