Home » News » Ohio NIL Vote: High School Principals to Decide on Athlete Deals

Ohio NIL Vote: High School Principals to Decide on Athlete Deals

by David Harrison – Chief Editor

Ohio High ⁤School athletes May Soon‍ Benefit from NIL Deals‌ Following Court Order

Columbus, OH – October 23, 2025 – A pivotal vote ⁢is looming for Ohio high school principals as they prepare to decide on a new bylaw⁣ regarding‍ Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights for student-athletes.The emergency referendum will be ​held November 17-21, following ‍a recent court decision ⁢that ‌has dramatically shifted the‌ landscape of amateur⁢ athletics​ in ⁤the ⁣state.

The move comes after Franklin County Common Pleas Court Judge Jaiza Page issued ⁢a⁣ temporary ‌restraining order‌ on Monday, effectively allowing Ohio’s​ approximately‍ 818 ⁢high school athletes to pursue NIL ⁤opportunities.This decision was spurred by a lawsuit filed by Jasmine Brown,⁤ mother of highly-ranked Wayne High School wide receiver Jamier Brown, a verbal‍ commit to Ohio‍ State.

Brown’s ​family alleges⁣ their‌ son has already lost out on over $100,000 in potential earnings⁢ due to Ohio’s existing restrictions on NIL. Jamier ‍Brown himself voiced ⁢his‍ desire ⁤to utilize his NIL rights to support his family and enhance⁤ his athletic and academic progress,stating⁢ on social media,”I want to ⁤be able to use my name,image,and likeness ‌to help⁤ my family financially and ⁣get the extra‌ after school academic ‍help and football training…NIL can make that possible.”

Ohio currently stands as one of only six ⁣states prohibiting ⁤high school athletes from profiting off their NIL, alongside Alabama, Indiana, Michigan, Mississippi, and Wyoming.⁣ A previous NIL proposal was overwhelmingly rejected⁢ by ⁣OHSAA members in 2022. However, the OHSAA Board of ‍Directors recently approved revised language ⁤for a new proposal, initially slated for a May vote, but expedited⁢ due to the court order.

The proposed bylaw aims to ⁤permit NIL agreements while‌ implementing crucial reporting procedures and limitations to safeguard​ student eligibility ⁢and maintain⁣ competitive fairness. Luke​ Fedlam, attorney for the Brown family, emphasized the ‌distinction between high⁢ school and collegiate ‌NIL regulations. “High school NIL is different from college NIL,” Fedlam ‌explained.⁤ “There ⁤are guardrails in​ place to protect the integrity of sport. Unlike college, we ‌don’t see the presence ⁤of collectives designed for recruitment and retention at the high school level.”

A further hearing regarding a preliminary​ injunction is​ scheduled for December 15th, ​adding another⁤ layer⁢ of urgency to the upcoming ‌vote. The outcome ⁢will determine whether ⁢Ohio high school athletes will be able to ⁤capitalize on their growing personal brands and the opportunities ⁣that NIL ⁢presents.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.