Home » Health » Tar-200 Plus Anti–PD-1 Therapy Shows Promising Neoadjuvant Activity in Cisplatin-Ineligible Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Tar-200 Plus Anti–PD-1 Therapy Shows Promising Neoadjuvant Activity in Cisplatin-Ineligible Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

by Dr. Michael Lee – Health Editor

Tar-200 Plus Anti-PD-1 Therapy Shows Promising Neoadjuvant Activity in Cisplatin-Ineligible Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

New data from the SunRISe-4 trial, recently published​ in The Lancet Oncology,⁢ demonstrate ⁤encouraging results for a novel neoadjuvant treatment ‌approach⁤ in patients ‍with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer who are unable to receive or choose to avoid cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The ⁢trial investigated ⁤the combination of TAR-200, an intravesical gemcitabine delivery system,⁤ with sacituzumab (sitrulimab), an ‍anti-PD-1 antibody, compared to sacituzumab alone.

the study enrolled​ patients with clinical stage T2-T4a, N0, M0 bladder cancer and randomized them to receive either four 3-weekly cycles of TAR-200 plus sacituzumab, or sacituzumab monotherapy, prior to radical cystectomy. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR), with secondary endpoints including pathologic‌ downstaging and relapse-free⁤ survival (RFS).

Results showed a substantially higher pCR rate in the combination arm (38%) compared to the monotherapy arm (24%).Moreover, over 50% of patients treated with TAR-200 plus sacituzumab experienced pathologic downstaging, a result consistent with previously observed data from checkpoint inhibitor therapies.

Early RFS data revealed ​a 1-year RFS rate of 77% for the combination therapy, compared to 66%⁣ with sacituzumab ​alone – representing a 10%⁤ absolute advancement.While the study ⁤wasn’t designed to definitively prove statistical significance in RFS, these findings suggest a potential benefit from adding intravesical therapy to anti-PD-1 treatment in the neoadjuvant setting.

The treatment combination demonstrated a manageable safety⁣ profile,with no new or⁢ unexpected adverse events reported. The majority of grade 3 to 4 adverse events were localized to the urinary tract, manifesting as symptoms or‍ irritation, and were effectively managed by investigators.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.