Home » Business » Millions for new logo – criticized internally

Millions for new logo – criticized internally

by Priya Shah – Business Editor

Millions Spent on⁢ Prison Service Rebrand Sparks Internal⁤ Criticism

Sweden’s Prison Service is⁢ rolling out a modernized visual⁤ identity – including a revised logo,updated⁢ colors,and a new font -⁢ in stages beginning mid-October,encompassing ⁢everything from vehicles​ to email signatures. ‌The changes, approved in ⁤March, are being justified by the agency as a necessary step toward “uniformity” and “clarity” amid organizational​ growth. ‍However, the⁤ rebrand is‍ facing meaningful backlash‌ from ⁤within‍ the service, with employees questioning the prioritization ‌of the project and its cost to taxpayers.

According ⁤to⁣ a press release,⁤ the Prison ⁤Service‌ aims ​to present ‌a “clearer and stronger” image.

Internal commentary, shared on the agency’s intranet, reveals deep ⁢skepticism. One⁣ employee questioned the comparison of the Correctional Service to major corporations ​like Ericsson, Volvo, and ICA, stating, “Why ⁣do we ⁢have to do it? Trams! ⁤A marginally changed logo ⁤that costs taxpayers ⁤money is a highly irresponsible priority.”

Other internal⁢ reactions include: “Finally! The ⁣old profile felt like 2024,” ⁢and a sarcastic,”Feels⁤ like money well spent. There were many ⁤of us who ⁢bothered us every day on the old⁣ profile. It is important to ‌prioritize the big problems first.”

Criticism also centered on the rationale provided for the rebrand. One employee labeled the explanations as “generic media platitudes,” ‌adding, “The Correctional ⁢Service ​is always relevant, not least now, for natural ⁤reasons.” Concerns were also raised about the project’s cost, with one ‍commenter ⁢requesting a⁢ full accounting of expenses, including technician time ⁣spent resolving issues arising ‌from the⁣ update.⁣ Additional complaints focused ‍on the aesthetic choices, with one ⁣employee stating, ‍”The font doesn’t look very serious,” ‍and ​another criticizing the ‌agency for “distinguishing its own name,” deeming it “incredibly unprofessional.” A final comment questioned the use of​ proper Swedish language within the ⁣agency’s ‌communications.

The concerns were highlighted by Waste Ombudsman Philip Syren.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.