Home » Business » FEMA Fraud: LA Men & Woman Charged in Wildfire Relief Scam

FEMA Fraud: LA Men & Woman Charged in Wildfire Relief Scam

by Priya Shah – Business Editor

Summary⁣ of the FEMA Fraud​ Case:

This article details‍ the charges against three‌ individuals‍ – two from Los Angeles⁤ and one‌ from Louisiana – for fraudulently obtaining over ⁢$40,000 in FEMA disaster assistance⁣ intended for victims of ⁢the January​ 2025 Los Angeles County wildfires. they falsely claimed residency in Altadena and the Pacific‍ Palisades to submit fraudulent applications.

Here’s a breakdown of each ‌defendant’s case:

* Jerry Lee Clay jr. (Los Angeles):

* ⁤ Charges: One count⁤ of procuring/offering ​a false instrument, one count of grand theft, two counts of unauthorized use of personal identifying​ facts.
⁢ * Amount Stolen: $14,919.30
*​ Details: ⁣Used ⁣a ⁢false Pacific‍ Palisades address and nonexistent apartment number.⁢ impersonated ‍landlords.
* Status: Pleaded not guilty, released on ‌$50,000 bond. ⁤Preliminary hearing Sept. 30. Potential sentence: 4 years and 4 months.

* Matthew Garnet O’Brien (Los Angeles):

* Charges: One count of offering a forged/false instrument, one count of grand ‍theft.
‌ * Amount Stolen: $12,314.52
‌⁤ * Details: ​ Used⁢ a false Altadena address.
‌ * Status: Surrendered‌ to ​law enforcement,released on own recognizance. arraignment ‍Nov. 25.Potential sentence: 3 years.

*‍ Maricka Marie Gilmore (Louisiana):

⁢ * Charges: One count of procuring/offering a false instrument,one count of grand ‌theft.
⁢ ⁢* Amount Stolen: $14,153.67
⁤ * Details: Used a false Pacific Palisades address and nonexistent apartment number.
⁤ ⁣ * Status: Extradited from Louisiana, held on $50,000 bail.⁤ Arraignment today. Potential sentence: 3 years.

Key takeaways:

* Strong Statement from DA: Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan⁢ J. Hochman⁤ emphasized the seriousness of ‌stealing⁢ from ​disaster victims and vowed to​ prosecute ‍FEMA fraud aggressively.
* Cyber Crime division Involvement: The DA’s Cyber Crime Division is actively involved ‍in the investigation.
* Ongoing Investigation: The cases are still‍ under investigation.
* Presumption of Innocence: The ⁤article explicitly states that the charges are allegations and the​ defendants are presumed innocent until proven‌ guilty.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.