Home » News » The Jake Moody blunder was no anomaly: Why highly drafted kickers fail so often

The Jake Moody blunder was no anomaly: Why highly drafted kickers fail so often

by David Harrison – Chief Editor

Highly Drafted Kickers Face ‍Long Odds: Jake Moody‘s Release Highlights a Decades-Long ‍Trend

The San Francisco 49ers’ recent decision to release kicker Jake Moody, a third-round draft pick, isn’t‌ an⁢ isolated incident.It’s the latest example of a historical pattern: investing high draft capital in kickers frequently fails to yield returns. Moody’s release after just one season underscores⁢ a long-standing challenge for NFL teams – accurately ⁣predicting success at a position often dominated by players overlooked in the draft process.

The 49ers’ gamble on Moody, selected 99th ⁢overall in 2023, mirrors past attempts to find franchise kickers through the draft. Despite the specialized nature of the position, the data reveals a⁣ striking disparity in performance⁣ between drafted and undrafted kickers, raising⁤ questions⁣ about the value ⁤of using⁤ premium picks on specialists. This trend impacts team strategy,roster⁢ construction,and the financial resources allocated to a position frequently enough viewed as less critical ​than ‍others.⁤

A look at recent‌ draft history reveals the difficulty of‌ finding⁤ success. Since 2000,drafted​ kickers have converted 82.1 percent of their field goal attempts, while undrafted kickers ‍have a slightly⁢ higher success rate of 83.3 percent.The numbers suggest that being drafted doesn’t​ guarantee success, and in manny cases, may not even improve a kicker’s ‌performance.

Further illustrating this point, a review of kicker​ draft ​positions and‌ relative⁢ player ⁣ratings ​(as of a recent assessment) shows a significant number ‌of ⁤undrafted players‌ achieving⁢ comparable or superior ratings to their drafted counterparts. The top 20 kickers, based on ⁤these ratings, include:

* Rank 1: 86.2 (Player Relative)
* ​ Rank 2: 86.1 (Undrafted)
* Rank 3: 86.1 (Round 5)
* Rank 4: 86.0 ‌(Team Relative)
* Rank 5: ‍85.8 (Undrafted)
* ‍ Rank 6: 85.8 (Player Relative)
* ‌ Rank 7: 85.6 (Team Relative)
* ⁢ Rank 8: 85.6 (Player Relative)
* Rank 9: ‍ 85.5 (Player Relative – Round 5)
* ‌ Rank 10: 85.4 (player Relative – Undrafted)
* Rank ⁣11: 85.4 (Team Relative)
* Rank 12: ‌ 85.3 (Player Relative)
* Rank 13: ‍85.3 (Team Relative)
* Rank 14: 85.2 ​(Player Relative)
* Rank 15: ⁤85.2 (Team Relative)
* Rank 16: 85.1 ‌(Player Relative)
* Rank ‍17: 85.0 (Team Relative)
* Rank 18: 84.9 (Player Relative)
* Rank 19: 84.8 (Team Relative)
* Rank 20: 84.7 (player Relative)

Players like Roberto ⁣Aguayo (drafted 59th overall in 2016 by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers) and Sebastian Janikowski⁣ (drafted 17th overall in 2000 by the Oakland Raiders, though ⁣ultimately triumphant) represent the extremes of this gamble. ⁢Aguayo was quickly released after a disappointing ‌rookie season,‍ while Janikowski enjoyed a long career, but even ​his success doesn’t negate the overall risk. More ⁤recently, daniel Carlson, drafted in the fifth round, ‌found⁣ success after being released by the Minnesota Vikings and joining the Las Vegas Raiders.

The 49ers’ general manager, John⁢ Lynch, acknowledged the difficulty‌ of these decisions.⁣ “They are tough decisions, as (Moody) is a very talented young man‌ and likely to go on elsewhere and have⁤ success,”⁢ Lynch said on KNBR radio. “And I hope that’s the case for him because he’s a great kid,and he handled it well. It’s tough, but you’ve got to make decisions in the best interest of the team.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.