Home » Sport » Millionaires vs. Alliance: Mosquera Red Card & Dogso Zone Explained

Millionaires vs. Alliance: Mosquera Red Card & Dogso Zone Explained

by Alex Carter - Sports Editor

Red Card Controversy Highlights ‍”DOGSO” Rule in Millonarios-Alianza Match

BARRANQUILLA, Colombia – A late first-half decision to issue a straight red card to Millonarios defender Sergio Mosquera during their BetPlay League match against Alianza FC on the 11th matchday sparked debate and underscored the ⁣increasingly​ critical⁤ role of the “DOGSO” rule ⁤in modern football officiating.The incident, ‌initially signaled as a yellow card, was upgraded to a red after a⁣ VAR review, leaving millonarios to play the second ‌half with ten men ⁤and ultimately concede a 2-0 defeat.

The expulsion occurred⁢ at the ⁢45-minute mark when Mosquera ⁢fouled ​an ⁤Alianza player attempting a pass, despite being the ⁤last defender and⁤ a⁣ considerable distance from the goal. The referee‍ initially issued a yellow card, but a⁢ subsequent review of the play via VAR led to ⁢the decision being ‌overturned, resulting in MosqueraS dismissal. This highlights a key element⁢ of the DOGSO criteria: preventing a promising attack, even if not instantly adjacent to the ⁣goal, can warrant a red card.

What is the DOGSO Zone?

DOGSO,an acronym for “Denying an Obvious Goal-scoring Opportunity,” is a crucial ⁢guideline for referees determining whether a foul merits ​a red card. The ⁤rule is‍ applied when a player commits an infraction that prevents an opponent from having ‍a clear and obvious chance to score. The determination rests on‌ the referee’s judgment of whether the foul was committed unfairly and⁤ deliberately,⁣ denying a legitimate ‌goal-scoring ​opportunity.

The assessment isn’t ⁤solely ⁤based on proximity to the goal. ⁤Factors considered include the direction of play, the likelihood of gaining control of the ball, and the location and number of defenders. Even if the foul occurs outside the penalty‌ area, ​a referee can issue a red ⁤card if they believe the infraction illegally‍ prevented ⁢a clear path to goal. The‌ Mosquera ​incident exemplifies this, ⁣as the VAR​ review⁤ determined his foul, despite⁢ its​ distance from the‍ goal, denied Alianza a promising attacking opportunity, justifying the red card.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.