Home » News » Michigan Election Case: Leonard, Sandler, and Others Demand Justice

Michigan Election Case: Leonard, Sandler, and Others Demand Justice

by David Harrison – Chief Editor

Calls​ Mount ⁣for Michigan AG to Clear Names ⁣of those Listed ‌as Co-Conspirators in False Electors ⁣Case

Following teh dismissal of charges against 15 individuals accused of being‌ false electors in the 2020 presidential election, ‌calls are growing‌ for Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel to officially clear the names of those identified as unindicted co-conspirators in the case. These include​ Tom Leonard, a former Speaker of the Michigan House and 2026 gubernatorial candidate; his ‍wife, Jenell Leonard, who owns a‌ public affairs ‍and communications firm; and Stu ‌Sandler, currently chief of⁢ staff for Florida Senator Rick Scott.

Ingham County Judge Kristen Simmons dismissed the⁤ charges against the 15 defendants, ⁤stating the prosecution ‌failed to demonstrate intent​ to commit⁣ election fraud. While those defendants⁣ are now free to move forward, the ​individuals named ⁤as co-conspirators remain under a cloud of⁣ suspicion ⁢despite‍ never being charged with any​ wrongdoing. None ⁢have received an explanation for their inclusion in ​the case.

Tom Leonard has publicly requested a federal inquiry ⁢into whether the prosecution was politically motivated, stating, “Dana Nessel is the moast reckless​ attorney general in​ the country and has repeatedly abused her office…This case never should‍ have been brought.” Sandler expressed similar skepticism, calling⁤ the ⁤case “garbage” and questioning whether the Attorney general⁢ would take steps to rectify the situation.

The original complaint also named ‌former ⁢state GOP Chair ⁤laura Cox as a co-conspirator, ‍though she was later reclassified as a cooperating witness. Additionally, the prosecution‍ mentioned Donald​ Trump, his ⁢attorneys ⁢Rudy Giuliani and⁤ Jenna‍ Ellis, and White House ⁤Chief of Staff Mark​ meadows as co-conspirators.

Nessel ⁣has indicated a‍ potential ‍appeal⁢ of Judge Simmons’ decision.⁤ Critics point to ⁤the Attorney‌ General’s handling of the Flint water crisis case, wich cost taxpayers $53 million and drew criticism for its ⁤protracted length, as evidence ⁢of a pattern of pursuing cases aggressively‍ even in the face of legal challenges. Following⁢ the⁣ dismissal of the ​electors case, Nessel suggested Judge Simmons may have been influenced by fear‍ of retribution from pro-Trump forces – a​ claim widely seen as an attack ⁤on the‍ judge’s integrity.

Advocates for clearing the ‍names of Leonard,Leonard,and Sandler ‍argue that the Attorney General should end any‌ further prosecution⁤ related to the case and⁤ officially remove the imputation of criminal activity from their records.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.