dutch Theologian Draws Firm Line: Faith and Film Are Incompatible
AMSTERDAM – A prominent Dutch theologian is sparking debate with his unequivocal stance against watching movies and series, arguing they actively hinder spiritual growth and align with a “worldly mindset.” Dr. Kees Joost Pabst, author of a newly released book on Christian living, contends that even selective viewing represents a dangerous compromise, perhaps opening the door to harmful influences.
PabstS position, rooted in ancient theological arguments and a contemporary assessment of streaming services, arrives as young people increasingly navigate a saturated media landscape. While acknowledging the potential for media literacy education, Pabst believes a complete avoidance of secular film and television is the most prudent course for committed Christians. The debate touches on core questions of Christian freedom, discernment, and the role of media in shaping worldview, especially for vulnerable young believers.
The theologian draws parallels between historical criticisms of theater leveled by figures like Calvin and Augustine and the immersive nature of modern filmmaking. Both, he asserts, involve artificiality and prioritize entertainment over substantive engagement with truth. “These objections also apply to feature films,” Pabst explained.”In both, people pretend to be other than they are, and the goal is amusement and passing the time.”
Pabst concedes that his viewpoint may not resonate with younger audiences, but remains resolute. He admits a personal inability to responsibly engage with film, stating, “I am not master of the button, to be honest.” however,he extends this personal limitation into a broader recommendation for a “radical no” toward platforms like Netflix and Videoland,questioning the potential for positive influence from secular content. “Why constantly search for what is just permissible, and what is just not?” he asks.
The author emphasizes that his family has adopted a strict no-film policy, coupled with open discussion and explanation for their children. He refutes the idea that this stance stifles media education, arguing that simply saying “no” is only one component of a thorough approach.
Pabst directly challenges the notion that christians are free to individually determine their media consumption based on conscience. He frames the issue as a “spiritual battle,” asserting that the devil utilizes visual media to instill a secular worldview. “How can the Holy Spirit flow in you if you fill your heart with worldly images?” he asks, framing his position as a necessary defense against spiritual compromise.
