Home » Sport » Conmebol South American Cup: Independiente vs. Chile Dispute – Latest Updates

Conmebol South American Cup: Independiente vs. Chile Dispute – Latest Updates

by Alex Carter - Sports Editor

Conmebol Ruling Looms as Independiente and Universidad de Chile Face Disciplinary Hearing

The fate of Independiente and Universidad de Chile in ⁢the 2025 ​South American Cup hangs in the balance as leaders from both clubs met with Conmebol officials in Paraguay ⁢this Tuesday. The hearing stems⁣ from the cancellation⁣ of their Round of 16 match‍ due to ‌fan ⁤incidents and subsequent club defenses presented last week.

According ​to ESPN journalist Nicolás Arrupt,the outcome may already be steadfast. “Week very⁤ vital for Independiente regarding the conmebol ruling,” Arrupt stated. “There will be‍ seperate hearings for leaders from both clubs.I think ‌there’s a draft of the ruling, ⁤but⁣ we’ll see if this ​discussion can change anything.”

Independiente presented a⁣ comprehensive 40-page defense last week. Arrupt outlined four⁣ potential scenarios: elimination of Independiente and qualification of Universidad de Chile; elimination for both teams;​ qualification of Independiente and⁢ elimination of Universidad de ‌Chile (considered unlikely); and the possibility of completing the match on the field,despite its cancellation – a loophole based on⁣ the regulations⁤ not explicitly forbidding it.

The Tuesday meeting represents a final opportunity for ⁤both clubs ⁣to present their case to the ​Conmebol Disciplinary Court and potentially mitigate any sanctions. Arrupt also reported that a ruling is expected before the‍ end of the South american Cup qualifiers, ​potentially even within this week, following reports from Peru suggesting a favorable outcome for Universidad ⁣de Chile.

“It⁢ is the last meeting and also the first between leaders of‍ Independiente and U of​ Chile in Conmebol,” Arrupt explained.”An audience to expand and explain the discharges last‍ week. It is indeed the last exhibition to​ see‍ if they finish convincing⁢ the Court of Discipline ⁤and that the sanction is as slight as possible.”

Despite the meeting, ‌Arrupt⁤ believes ⁢”the decision ​is already cranked, beyond what happens today.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.