The potential for quantum computing to compromise existing cryptographic standards used by Bitcoin and Ethereum presents a meaningful challenge for the cryptocurrency space, according to industry observers.
One concern is the possibility of a network split, similar to those seen in other blockchain projects, where a segment of users might resist adopting new security protocols designed to counter quantum threats. This could lead to a divergence in approaches to network upgrades.
The sheer volume of Bitcoin and Ethereum wallets created since their respective launches also poses an implementation hurdle. The successful adoption of quantum-resistant measures hinges on users upgrading their software and securing their accounts. Failure to do so could introduce vulnerabilities to the network, potentially leading to fund losses and subsequent blame directed at the blockchain itself.
Mysten Labs has suggested that if Bitcoin had initially employed the EdDSA signature scheme, even wallets associated with its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, could be made quantum-safe.
However, itS acknowledged that this perspective is informed by hindsight.At the time of Bitcoin’s launch in 2009, quantum computing was not a widely considered threat.The prevailing assumption was that SHA-256, the hashing algorithm used by Bitcoin, was sufficiently robust and would take many years to break. The rapid advancement of quantum computing capabilities has outpaced these earlier predictions.
Generally Bright Newsletter
A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.
→ Full text of the original article.
