Home » Business » Harco Denies Coverage in “It Ends With Us” Insurance Dispute

Harco Denies Coverage in “It Ends With Us” Insurance Dispute

Here’s a breakdown of teh provided text, focusing on the key elements of the legal situation:

Core Situation:

harco National Insurance Company has filed a declaratory judgment action against its insureds, including Wayfarer Studios LLC, it Ends With Us Movie LLC, and Justin Baldoni (collectively “Defendants”). Harco is seeking a court ruling that it has no obligation to defend or indemnify these Defendants in a lawsuit filed by Blake Lively.The underlying Lawsuit (Blake Lively v. Wayfarer Studios, et al.):

Plaintiff: blake Lively
Defendants: Wayfarer Studios LLC, It Ends With Us Movie LLC, Justin Baldoni
Allegations: Serious misconduct, including sexual harassment and a unfriendly work habitat, occurred while Lively was the lead actor for “It Ends With Us.” The lawsuit also alleges retaliation for complaining about this mistreatment.
Timing of Alleged Misconduct: Began in May 2023.
Filing Date of Lawsuit: December 2024. Court: U.S.D.C., S.D.N.Y.
Case Number: 1:24-cv-10049-LJL

The Insurance policies and Harco’s Denial:

Insurer: Harco National Insurance company
Policies: Two management liability policies issued to the Defendants:
2023 Policy: Effective july 15, 2023, to July 15, 2024.
2024 Policy: Effective July 15,2024,to July 15,2025.
Notification of Claim: Defendants notified Harco of the Underlying Action on April 25, 2025, requesting defence and indemnity.
Harco’s Response: Harco denied coverage and filed the declaratory judgment action.

harco’s Reasons for Denying Coverage:

  1. Failure to Provide Timely notice (under the 2023 Policy): Harco claims the Defendants did not provide notice of the claim promptly enough when it was frist made under the 2023 Policy.
  2. Prior Knowledge Exclusion (under both policies): Harco argues that before both policies were effective, the Defendants were aware of Lively’s allegations. despite this awareness, they warranted on thier applications that they knew of no facts or circumstances that could lead to a claim. This prior knowledge, according to Harco, triggers an exclusion that bars coverage.
  3. Claim Made Before Policy Inception (under the 2024 Policy): Harco contends that Lively’s initial demand in November 2023 constituted a “claim” that was made before the 2024 Policy took effect, thus precluding coverage under that policy.

Key Takeaways for Policyholders:

The article emphasizes that Harco’s reasons for denial are common insurer defenses. policyholders should be mindful of:

The Submission: answer all questions truthfully and thoroughly during the application process.Inaccurate or incomplete answers can lead to denials or rescission.
Prompt Notice: Provide notice to yoru insurer quickly. Delayed notice can jeopardize coverage, especially if the insurer is prejudiced. Consider “notice of circumstances” provisions if available.
Understanding Exclusions: Pay close attention to policy exclusions,such as prior knowledge exclusions,as they can limit coverage. These can sometimes be negotiated during policy procurement.
* Seeking Assistance: Engage experienced coverage attorneys, brokers, and risk management professionals when needed.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.