How should we defend our cognitive sovereignty?
Short videos will not disappear, and reading will not perish.The key is whether we still have the courage and will to keep a piece of it for ourselves“The forest of reading“–Even if this forest is not big, not lively or prosperous, it is indeed quiet, deep and long-lasting, allowing us to regain the rhythm of thinking, breathe rational air, and regain the peace in our hearts. words are the crystallization of human civilization and the ladder to the soul. in this era where attention is torn apart and rhythm is urged, it is indeed notably crucial to regain the dignity of words, rebuild the solemnity of reading, and let calmness, logic and depth become the background color of the spiritual world.
“`html
New Insight: Cognitive Sovereignty Threatened as Short-Form Content Dominates, Experts Urge Return to Reading for Deeper Thought.
In an era where attention spans are fragmented and the pace of information consumption accelerates, the practice of deep reading is facing an unprecedented challenge. While short videos continue to proliferate, the enduring value of reading remains a critical, albeit increasingly contested, element for cultivating cognitive sovereignty. The question is not whether these formats will coexist,but whether individuals possess the will to preserve dedicated space for reading amidst the digital deluge.
The article posits that the “forest of reading,” though perhaps diminished in size or vibrancy, offers a sanctuary for introspection. This space, characterized by its quietude and depth, allows for the recovery of thoughtful pacing, the inhalation of rational discourse, and the restoration of inner peace. Words, described as the bedrock of human civilization and a conduit to the soul, are presented as essential tools for navigating an attention-scarce environment. Reclaiming the inherent dignity of words and the solemnity of the reading process is crucial for fostering calmness, logic, and depth within our spiritual lives.
The piece further elaborates on the relationship between reading and thinking. It suggests that a significant portion of the population engages in thought without the benefit of reading, often by choice. though, for those who do read, the practice inherently aids in thinking by slowing down cognitive processes and opening avenues to diverse perspectives. The article emphasizes
