Worker’s Resignation Claim Rejected in Employment Dispute
Dismissal Argument Fails as Fair Work Commission Finds No Forced Resignation
A former employee’s attempt to claim unfair dismissal after accepting a job with a competitor has been unsuccessful, as the Fair Work Commission (FWC) determined he did not resign under duress. The case highlights the complexities surrounding post-employment obligations and employer responses to staff departures.
Legal Challenge and Initial Offer
On February 11, 2025, the worker accepted a position at a rival real estate firm, with a scheduled start date of February 20, 2025. However, his previous employer discovered the new employment on February 19, 2025, and promptly engaged legal counsel to send a letter. This communication reminded the worker of his existing post-employment commitments and warned of potential legal repercussions.
Unfair Dismissal Claim Dismissed
Following receipt of the legal notice, the worker filed a claim with the FWC, asserting that his employer’s actions—specifically, the implication that his post-employment obligations were waived—led him to end his employment. He argued he was effectively forced to resign. The FWC, however, rejected this argument, stating “On the facts, [the worker] did not resign (and so could not have been forced to resign)”
.
Recent data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics shows that approximately 1 in 7 employees change jobs each year, often leading to similar legal considerations regarding contracts and non-compete clauses. ABS Job Mobility Statistics (2024)
Employer Intent vs. Actual Action
The FWC also clarified that, despite the employer’s intention to terminate the worker’s employment during a meeting on February 7, 2025, no actual termination occurred at the employer’s initiative. This distinction proved crucial in the Commission’s decision. The ruling underscores the importance of clear and documented employment termination procedures.
The outcome of this case serves as a reminder to both employers and employees to carefully review and understand their contractual obligations, particularly concerning post-employment restrictions, and to seek legal advice when navigating complex employment law matters.
