Monday, December 8, 2025

Title: Taner Kılıç: Amnesty’s Role and Ongoing Human Rights Pressure in Turkey

Turkish Human Rights Lawyer Taner Kılıç Speaks ​Out After Acquittal, Cites Amnesty InternationalS Crucial Support During ⁤Imprisonment

Istanbul, Türkiye – prominent ‌Turkish⁣ human‌ rights lawyer ‌Taner Kılıç has spoken‍ publicly for the first time following ⁢his⁤ recent acquittal, detailing​ the psychological impact of imprisonment based on ‍unsubstantiated allegations ⁣and the vital role international organizations like Amnesty International played ⁤in ⁣securing his freedom. Kılıç was initially ⁤arrested in 2016 ⁢amidst a⁣ widespread crackdown⁢ following a failed coup ⁢attempt,accused of using the ‌ByLock messaging app – a claim he vehemently⁢ denies.

“The accusations against me⁤ were⁤ absurd and unfair.​ Yet a ‍campaign was waged against me on ​television, ‍newspapers and social media. ⁤I wanted⁣ to stop everyone on the street – whether I knew them or not – and ​tell them: ‘What they say about me is not true. They ⁢are lies!'”​ Kılıç recounted, describing his helplessness while incarcerated‌ and cut off from ​the outside world. “During this time when my voice⁢ was ​suppressed and silenced, Amnesty was my voice. Psychologically that was very important for me.”

Kılıç’s case was ⁢far from isolated. He estimates the ByLock ⁣allegation ‍appeared in the files of​ “tens, if not hundreds, of thousands”‍ of people, leading to widespread convictions.His case garnered international attention, prompting statements ⁢from Amnesty​ International, united ⁢Nations ‌committees, the⁤ European Parliament, and foreign ministries including the German Foreign Ministry.

“If ‍there were so many​ inconsistencies in my case, imagine the other⁤ cases,” Kılıç stated, drawing on his ⁤experiences as a lawyer while imprisoned and reviewing numerous files. He described a system where ‌individuals were routinely imprisoned immediately upon being​ brought before a judge.

While acknowledging⁤ a decrease in arrests in⁣ recent years,Kılıç cautioned ⁢against ‍assuming‍ fairness in Turkey’s political processes. “It would be premature⁣ to claim that political processes in Turkey are fair,” he⁢ said, noting that both​ the ‍Turkish Supreme court‌ (Yargıtay) and⁤ the European‌ Court of⁤ Human Rights ultimately found in ‍his ​favor.

The period following the July 2016 coup attempt saw a dramatic​ increase in‌ pressure on civil society, ‍with numerous organizations⁣ closed‌ and activists ‌facing prosecution and ‍arrest,⁢ as detailed in reports ​by Amnesty International (https://www.amnesty.de/2016/7/18/tuerkei-nach-dem-putsch-menschenrechte-ernsthaft-gefahr and https://www.amnesty.de/informieren/aktuell/angeklagt-weil-sie-menschenrechte-verteidigen). This pressure, Kılıç explained, forced many ⁤individuals working in or aspiring ​to ‌work in state institutions to withdraw from civic organizations, significantly weakening ‍civil society and human rights solidarity networks.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.