Monday, December 8, 2025

Korea-US Investment Deal Stalls: Phased Approach Under Discussion

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

Seoul Considers Phased Investment, Revenue Sharing ⁣too Break Tariff Impasse with U.S.

SEOUL – Negotiations surrounding a ⁣potential $350 billion investment package between South Korea and the ‌United States are facing hurdles over allocation and control of funds, prompting Seoul to explore strategies including phased⁣ investments and revenue-sharing agreements to secure favorable tariff ‌concessions.

While a preliminary agreement⁢ was reached in July ​to lower‍ mutual tariffs – perhaps from 25⁣ percent to 15 percent, ​including reductions on automobiles -⁢ details regarding the investment’s structure remain unresolved. Discussions center on options‍ such as⁣ South Korea leading⁣ a $150 ⁣billion shipbuilding project while the U.S. manages the remainder, or granting Washington control of ⁤the entire​ package with⁣ corresponding tariff ⁤adjustments.

South Korea’s chief ‍trade negotiator, Yeo Han-gu,⁣ traveled to Kuala Lumpur​ this week ​for the ASEAN Economic Ministers’ Meeting, where talks with U.S. Trade‍ Representative Jamieson Greer are expected to address the stalled investment and other non-tariff barriers.

Experts advise against replicating Japan’s recent $550 billion pledge to the U.S., ⁣backed by a currency swap with the Federal Reserve, arguing ​it’s⁤ not⁢ aligned ‌with South Korea’s economic⁣ realities. sogang University ‍economics professor ‌Heo Jeong ‍advocates for a ‌more measured approach. “It’s unrealistic to execute $350 billion quickly,” Heo said, recommending phased investments, conditional currency ⁤swaps,‍ and targeted corporate projects. “Setting annual limits and negotiating conditional swaps ‌with the U.S. could help ​South Korea maintain⁤ control.”

Heo ⁣further ‍suggested linking investment returns to job ⁣creation and supply ⁢chain progress, and allocating 5-10 percent⁢ of funds to collaborative R&D with ⁤joint intellectual property ​ownership. ⁣

Kang Gu-sang, of the⁢ Korea Institute for International​ Economic ⁣Policy, emphasized the importance of securing benefits for korean companies, particularly ⁣within the​ shipbuilding ⁤sector.‌ “Ensuring⁢ benefits ⁤for Korean companies is essential,” Kang stated.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.