Monday, December 8, 2025

Alliant Poaching Case: Marsh Unit Secures Preliminary Injunction

by Priya Shah – Business Editor

Marsh ⁢& McLennan Agency Secures Partial Injunction Against Alliant Insurance​ Services in Client Solicitation Dispute


world-today-news.com

A⁤ New York federal court has issued a partial preliminary injunction ⁤against​ Alliant Insurance Services, restricting the brokerage ⁤and two ⁣former Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA) employees from‌ actively⁤ soliciting their previous clients. The ruling stems from allegations of a⁤ coordinated effort to ⁣poach clients ⁢following the employees’ departure to Alliant.

Details of the Legal Action

The case,marsh & McLennan Agency LLC v. Alliant Insurance Services Inc., Andrew Oldenburg, Elizabeth McKinney, ⁤Kimberly Moore, and Danielle‌ Black, was filed in Manhattan⁢ federal court in August.MMA alleges that ‍Andrew Oldenburg orchestrated a departure of staff and ⁢clients from the Beaverton, Oregon office when he joined Alliant in july.

MMA claims the departures resulted​ in the loss of 14 clients and approximately $600,000 in revenue, attributing this loss to breaches of‍ restrictive covenants and ​non-solicitation agreements signed by the former employees.

Scope⁢ of the Injunction

The court’s injunction specifically targets Alliant, along with Andrew Oldenburg and ‍Elizabeth McKinney, preventing them from soliciting former MMA clients. However, the injunction does not extend to ​the servicing of clients who have already transitioned their business to Alliant. Furthermore, it excludes two other former MMA employees, Kimberly Moore and Danielle‌ Black, from the restrictions.

The court determined ⁢that MMA did not provide sufficient evidence demonstrating that Moore and ‌Black were directly involved in ⁣servicing ⁢former MMA clients.

Company Statements

MMA declined to⁣ provide a comment on the ruling. ​Alliant insurance Services did not respond to requests ⁢for⁢ comment at the time of publication.

This article provides⁤ a factual account of the court’s decision and the allegations made by Marsh & McLennan Agency. It is intended ‍for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

I hope ‌you found this report insightful. If you have any thoughts on this case, or ‌other insurance industry news you’d⁤ like to see covered, please share your comments below! And if you appreciate in-depth,‌ unbiased reporting like this, consider subscribing to our newsletter – it’s the best way ​to stay informed.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.