Monday, December 8, 2025

Long Beach’s New Law Sparks Retail Theft Debate

Long Beach Implements Self-Checkout Regulations, Sparking Debate & Customer impact

Long‍ Beach, California,⁣ has enacted‍ new regulations governing self-checkout lanes in large ​stores, a response⁤ to a⁣ nationwide ⁣surge in shoplifting and‌ growing concerns over ‍retail theft. ⁢The ordinance, recently put into effect, aims to curb⁣ losses but is ‌already causing frustration for shoppers and raising concerns about potential price increases.

The move comes as shoplifting incidents ‌across the ⁣U.S. have dramatically increased. According to a study ​by the National ​Retail Federation, shoplifting incidents jumped 93% from ⁣2019 to 2023. In 2023 alone, retailers surveyed reported an average of 177 retail thefts per day.

The Long Beach regulations mandate ​that large stores maintain at least one staff member for every ‍three self-checkout stations. The ordinance also limits customers⁣ to a⁤ maximum⁢ of 15 items when using self-checkout, and prohibits the purchase of items ​secured in locked display cases through these lanes.

The ‍California Grocers Assn. has ‌warned that ‌the requirements coudl lead to longer⁤ checkout lines and higher grocery prices,⁤ as retailers are forced to either increase ​staffing or reduce the number of self-checkout kiosks.‍ Some stores have already reacted to the new rules. Signs have appeared ​at Albertsons and Vons locations in Long​ Beach stating self-checkout⁢ lanes are closed “due to a new city of long Beach ​ordinance.”⁢

At a ‌Long Beach Target, five self-checkout stations were open, each monitored by one employee. ⁣According ⁤to the ordinance, opening additional stations would require hiring another ​employee for supervision.

Shoppers are ⁤already noticing the changes. ⁤Francilla Isaac, a Long Beach resident, stated, “I use‍ it a lot‌ when I’m just here to⁤ get a ​few items…But all the stores​ are the⁤ same now, they have it closed.”

Industry⁣ groups representing retailers like Target and Walmart argue the ordinance will increase ‌labor costs and ultimately lead to⁢ higher prices⁤ for consumers, and⁢ also ‌reduced sales. Nate Rose, a vice president at the California ​Grocers Assn., said, “These ‍efforts ⁢will ultimately damage self-checkout…We’re ​seeing that worst-case scenario play ⁣out where a number of grocers have decided it’s not worth it to keep⁢ the self-checkout lanes open.”⁣

The California Retailers Assn. echoed these concerns,with president ⁤Rachel Michelin stating,”The problem with the ‌Long Beach ordinance is that it’s so constricting…I​ think we’re ⁣going to‍ see ⁣unintended​ consequences.” The association believes retailers should have the​ freedom to determine the most effective strategies for addressing theft.

though, ⁤union leader Bell argues that the opposition stems from grocery companies’ reluctance⁢ to increase staffing or employee hours, particularly considering ongoing minimum wage increases. He believes ‍increased staffing could actually ⁣ improve both customer experience and company profitability, stating, “This should be⁢ better for the customers. And ‍it should actually improve profitability⁤ for ⁣the companies.”

Lisa Adams, a visitor to Long​ Beach⁤ from Utah, expressed missing ‌the convenience of self-checkout, but acknowledged the‍ need to address theft. she recounted witnessing a theft firsthand,⁤ describing⁢ the⁤ scene as “chaotic and loud,” observing a man pretending to ‌scan items before⁤ fleeing the store.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.