Monday, December 8, 2025

Judge Blocks Trump Subpoena of Transgender Patient Medical Records

by Emma Walker – News Editor

Judge‌ Blocks Trump Administration Subpoena for ⁢Transgender Patient Records at Boston Children’s Hospital

A federal judge has halted​ the ‍Trump administration’s‌ attempt to obtain medical records of transgender patients who received gender-affirming care at Boston Children’s Hospital, deeming⁤ the subpoena “improper” and driven by “bad faith.”

U.S. District⁢ Judge⁣ Myong ‌Joun ruled Tuesday that the justice Department’s request for extensive patient data ‍- including individual ‌records – appeared unrelated to its stated⁣ purpose of investigating potential fraud or unlawful drug promotion. The‍ judge ‍found the subpoena was a thinly⁣ veiled attempt to interfere ‌with Massachusetts’ protections for gender-affirming ⁣care (GAC), harass the hospital, and discourage patients from seeking ‍treatment.

The Justice ​Department claimed⁤ the⁣ investigation was‌ focused on healthcare fraud and off-label drug prescriptions. though, Judge Joun highlighted the administration’s documented disapproval of the transgender ⁢community and its efforts to restrict access to ⁣care, pointing to a 2017 executive order ​and a ‌June announcement from the Civil Division prioritizing investigations into “radical⁣ gender experimentation.” Attorney General⁢ pam Bondi previously stated the ‌Justice Department had ⁤issued over ⁤20 subpoenas to‍ providers of care for transgender youth.Boston Children’s Hospital argued the subpoena demanded nearly all documents⁢ related to GAC provided over‌ the ⁤past five and a half years, including⁣ highly sensitive patient facts.

Judge⁤ Joun​ emphasized ⁢that ‌Massachusetts’ state ⁣constitution protects the right to ⁤gender-affirming care, further questioning ⁢the legitimacy ⁤of the ‍Justice Department’s investigation.

Gender-affirming care encompasses a range of medical and mental health services supporting ⁣a ​person’s gender identity,‌ and is supported by most major medical groups as crucial‌ for ​individuals experiencing gender dysphoria. Currently,⁢ a legal‍ landscape exists where at least 27 states are restricting or‌ banning⁢ this care‌ for minors, ⁣while others are actively protecting access.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.