Youssef El-Sharif and “touching women” .. innocent or convicted?

For suggestions of places to go out

–
–

A widespread case of controversy has spread through social media, due to the statements of the artist Youssef El Sharif about some of the conditions that he places in his artwork and related to hot scenes, in his dialogue with Ramy Radwan, on the dmc screen, in the program “evening dmc”.

Websites published statements attributed to “Al Sharif” in which he says that he refuses to “contact women”, but it has been checked with accuracy that they are wrong.

Initially, Al-Sharif explained the truth of his statements by his refusal to “touch women”, and he said through his Twitter account: “I do not know how the word (hot scenes) turned into (female contact) in general. We have to assume good intentions, and of course this scene is already blurred, that is, its relationship to words.” A very ordinary scene and imagine that all this shower is due to a statement from a false account. They lied and believed the lie. ”

ش Don’t know what the word (hot scenes) turned to (female contact) In general, we have to assume good intentions, and of course this scene is already blurred, that is, a relationship with this word. This is a very normal scene, and imagine that all this shower is due to a statement from a false account. Lie and lie to the lie. Https://t.co/xD4Fsa9M2g

– Youssef el sherif (@ElSherif) June 27, 2020

For its part, his wife, Engy Alaa, explained the truth of the statements, and said through her account on Facebook: “In a lot of false news about Yusuf circulated from his dialogue with the journalist Rami Radwan who broadcast in his evening program dmc, but distorted with a little bit more Yusuf I talk about hot scenes and know Many other artists do not like to do it … What should women have touched the issue?

And she continued: «He is not aware of the biography of female contact and dialogue on the channel’s page! I would like to be in the investigation of accuracy when covering the dialogues and respect for the opinion and actions of people as long as they do not harm anyone and thank you to all the owners of professional pens who did not cover the dialogue, I quoted what actually took place in the Youssef Sharif dialogue ».

Announcer Rami Radwan commented on the matter, and published a video clip of the meeting that explains Sharif’s talk about hot scenes and not touching women as it spread. My business contracts for refusing to come into contact with women “and the fact that the context of the speech was about his rejection of” hot scenes “in his works and clarifying what he means in the dialogue … as is clear, the video.

And after Al-Sharif’s statements that spread, there was a campaign to support a number of stars for Al-Sharif’s stance. The actor, Ayten Amer, said: “Frankly, you are frustrated with sincerity from Interview Youssef Al-Sharif. With his beliefs or convictions, he is young, uncle.

Artist Karim Fahmy said: “The man, I love him and respect him in general, is sincere, diligent, free in his opinion, and respected.” Nahed El Sebaei said: “It is why people demand sexual freedom for homosexuals, and criticize a man who rejects hot scenes for his own reasons. This is personal freedom. You liked him, watching him, working with him, and in the other they liked him, Youssef Sharif.

The artist Hisham Majed commented on the controversy, and said through his account: “In some people, whether they are professionals in the artistic field, journalists or ordinary people, they took advantage of the words they said Youssef Al-Sharif in his program with Ramy Radwan and started attacking him, and they published needs for old films that he worked to prove that he was doing The needs are normal, as this means a lot of virtue.

He continued: «All respect for Youssef Al-Sharif .. An elegant and respectful artist will tire for his work and respect his fans .. And all respect for any agreed or different with his words, but with respect .. Everyone has freedom in his thoughts as long as he respects those around him and does not harm anyone .. You do not like his words You do not look at his works or appreciate what you do .. You look, break and distort it, on the pretext that you are the lawyer who defends the right to art and freedom of creativity, and it keeps a deficient person. ”