Warden under vacuum and 9 county ministers

Ghada Halawi wrote in “Nidaa Al-Watan”: Yesterday’s ceremony included a series of statements regarding the invitation of Mikati to hold a government session, his invitation was interpreted as an attempt to establish a Sunni custom and an attempt to float his presidency in anticipation of an upcoming visit to Saudi Arabia. With the strength of the “Shiite duo”, Mikati set the date for his government session, and it is not known whether the duo, namely “Hezbollah” and “Amal”, wanted to launch the fireball against Basil and his intransigence for refusing to appoint Suleiman Franjieh, and that “Hezbollah” has become a presidential embarrassment among its allies. The administration of business in the country in an attempt to take advantage of the time. However, in a fatal penalty, the response came from nine ministers in the government to make it impossible to hold the session under the constitution, which makes its session unconstitutional with nine ministers not attending. This means that it is a session without a constitutional agreement, unless Mikati insists on having it with those who have participated, and at that moment he will also be faced with a dilemma in approving decisions. Another penalty was collected by the Shiite duo alongside Mikati, who clashed with Basilio’s answer, to put an end to any attempt to exclude the Christian component.

However, despite what happened, the Great Seraglio had its different readings, as government circles saw in the pastor’s words “a good approach, and contrary to the incitement that took place, the patriarch did not refuse to hold the session despite the mobilization that the “current” made due to the visits of personalities from it to the patriarch and the incitement against the background of the pact.” The circles denounced the approach The theme of the session is in terms of paper, while there are urgent points that can only be approved by decree of the Council of Ministers, such as hospital appropriations, transport allowances for the military and others”. Will the calling of a session to manage the affairs of the people affect the course of the election of the president? The circles insisted that the session take place and the decisions issued by it be signed by the prime minister and the competent minister. A session with two constitutional dilemmas, if held: the conduct of business in light of the vacuum and the boycott of nine ministers .