Sunday, December 7, 2025

US Union Membership Rising in States with Collective Bargaining Rights

by David Harrison – Chief Editor

Union Strongholds and Declines: A Growing ‍Divide​ Across the​ US

Washington D.C. – ​ A stark geographical and​ political⁣ divide is increasingly evident in the ‍American labor landscape,with union membership flourishing in states that protect collective bargaining rights while dwindling in those⁤ with “right-to-work” laws,according to⁤ a new ⁤report.The findings, released by the Illinois​ Economic Policy ⁣Institute and the ‍Project for Middle Class Renewal at ​the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, paint a clear picture: where unions are‍ empowered, they⁣ grow – and where they‍ are⁤ restricted, they ⁢suffer.

The‌ report reveals a significant disparity between ⁤the​ 26 states with right-to-work ‍laws – largely⁤ concentrated in the South and Central US ‍-⁢ and the 24 ⁣states (plus Washington D.C.)⁤ that actively safeguard​ collective bargaining.​ Union density in right-to-work states stands at a mere 5.1%, a fraction ⁣of the⁤ 14.2% found in states with pro-union ⁤protections, which are primarily ⁣located on the coasts and‍ in the North.

Economic Impact: A Clear Disadvantage‍ for Right-to-Work States

The consequences extend⁣ beyond mere membership ‌numbers. Workers in right-to-work states earn ‍approximately 7% less in wages, even after accounting for⁢ regional cost-of-living ‌differences. Moreover, these states experience ⁢a disproportionately higher rate of ⁤employment discrimination, with 36% ⁤more‍ charges filed with the‌ Equal employment⁣ Possibility ‍Commission compared to states that protect collective bargaining.

“These findings underscore the critical ‌role strong unions play in bolstering ⁢wages, benefits, and fair treatment for workers,” explains david Harrison, ‌News Editor and SEO Strategist ‍at world-today-news.com. “The ⁤data clearly demonstrates that restricting union power has tangible negative consequences for working families.”

The Impact of Janus v. AFSCME and recent State actions

The decline ⁢in union ‌membership isn’t solely attributable‍ to​ state-level right-to-work ⁢laws. The 2018 Supreme Court decision Janus v. AFSCME stripped public sector workers in all 50 states of collective bargaining rights, further ‍weakening⁢ the labor movement nationally.

However, some states are actively pushing back. ⁤Illinois,‌ which enshrined​ the right to collective bargaining in its constitution with a 2022 amendment, ⁣has seen a remarkable resurgence in union membership. In 2024 alone,the state added 27,000 union members,bringing ⁢its unionization rate⁣ to 13.1% – the most significant increase in over seven years.

Beyond Wages: The Broader Benefits of Unionization

The Illinois exmaple highlights the ‍broader benefits of union membership. The report found that union members in the state are 8.3% ‍more likely ‌to own⁣ homes, 5.2% more likely ​to have health insurance, and less reliant on public assistance ​programs like ⁢Medicaid and ⁣SNAP.

these findings reinforce the argument that strong unions aren’t just about wages; they contribute to greater economic security and overall well-being for⁤ workers and their families. As the US ‍continues to grapple with ⁤issues of income⁤ inequality and economic opportunity, the debate over the future ⁣of unions​ – and the laws that govern them – ‍is likely to intensify.

Related: Hundreds of staff at California national parks to unionize amid Trump turmoil

Sources:

State of the Unions 2025 Report
AFL-CIO: Right to Work

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.