The political force believes that the state should carefully consider the role of all parties involved in the digital television fraud scandal, where accusations have been made against the former chairman of the board of SIA “Tet” Gulbis and four other persons.
“As Gulbis has been accused of fraud in connection with the introduction of digital television and the media have previously reported losses to the state-owned company of almost 7.6 million euros, no compensation is allowed for leaving the position. In any case, action should be taken to recover the losses. , created for the state by the management of the existing management, “said the party.
The party emphasized that the council of SIA “Tet” (formerly SIA “Lattelecom”) has been chaired by Gatis Kokins since December 1, 2009, who has been present at several stages of digital television implementation and “has never publicly tried to act actively during these 11 years. to recover the damage caused to the State “.
“Instead, there has been an avoidance and a possible concealment of traces that continues to this day. The Tet Council has chosen a tactic of spending state-owned money to hire special foreign experts. The Attorney General’s Office has already taken a clear position on what has happened. can be seen as a waste of public funds for which the perpetrators would be held accountable, “JKP argued.
According to the party, the state, which owns the majority of SIA “Tet” shares, must immediately act and replace the state representative in the company’s council, because the existing representatives are in conflict of interest and cannot objectively assess the true state and public interests in this company.
As reported, SIA “Tet”, under the pretext of the terms of the agreement, does not disclose the compensation paid to the former chairman of the board Gulbis, leaving the position, said “Tet” representative Lāsma Trofimova.
“According to the decision of the shareholders’ meeting, Gulbis was removed from the position of the Chairman of the Board. At the same time, it meant leaving the position of the Chief Executive Officer. Trofimova.
When asked what compensation was provided for in the contract, Trofimova replied that “the terms of the contracts are confidential to third parties and prevent the disclosure of precise terms”.
On the question of whether Tet Meisitis, Director of Tet Legal, will retain his position, Trofimova said that the results of independent investigations and financial audits did not reveal any evidence of abusive or non-commercial conduct by Tet’s current or former employees and officials. . Consequently, the Board and the Council of “Tet” have unanimously decided that, taking into account the available information, Meisitis is currently continuing to perform his duties.
It has already been reported that the members of “Tet” on Friday, December 4, have decided to recall the chairman of the board of the company Juri Gulbi. The decision took effect on Friday, December 4.
Others are currently reading
Mink skulls who have lost their jobs are returning to Latvia from Denmark. Fellow people are worried that they will bring home Covid-19
–
–
–
PHOTO: they survived Covid-19, but still don’t feel well – how rehabilitated in Russia are being rehabilitated
–
–
–
