Home » News » Trump Tariffs: A Master Plan or Risky Gamble?

Trump Tariffs: A Master Plan or Risky Gamble?

by David Harrison

as we approach the Trump administration’s self-imposed 90-day deadline for trade deals, markets are starting to speculate about what comes next. The longer uncertainty remains elevated, the more negative its impact on the economy, as shown in the chart below.

Maybe the strategy is to maintain 30% tariffs on China and 10% tariffs on all other countries and then give all countries 12 months to lower non-tariff barriers and open up their economies to trade.

Extending the deadline one year would give countries and US domestic businesses time to adjust to the new world with permanently higher tariffs, and it would also result in an immediate decline in uncertainty, which would be positive for business planning, employment, and financial markets.

This would seem like a victory for the world and yet would produce $400 billion of annual revenue for US taxpayers. Trade partners will be happy with only 10% tariffs and US tax revenue will go up. Maybe the administration has outsmarted all of us.

Note: Impulse response from the VAR model with variables log (Real GDP) and log (Economic Policy Uncertainty Index). One standard deviation shock to Economic policy uncertainty leads to a 0.2% point decline in Real GDP. Temporary shock is defined as four standard deviation shock in Q1 and permanent shock is defined as four standard deviation in Q1, three standard deviation in Q2, two standard deviation in Q3 and one standard deviation in Q4. Sources: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

Download high-res chart

Trump’s Trade Tariffs: Will Extending the Deadline Ease Economic Uncertainty?

economy?">

With the Trump administration’s 90-day deadline for new trade deals fast approaching, financial markets are abuzz with speculation about the future of trade policy and its potential impact on the global economy. The central question: will extending the deadline for these trade negotiations alleviate the growing economic uncertainty?

The Looming Deadline and Market Speculation

As the self-imposed 90-day deadline draws near, markets are actively considering various scenarios. The longer this period of uncertainty persists, the more detrimental its effects could be on the overall economic landscape. Economic uncertainty can negatively impact business investment and consumer spending, ultimately slowing economic growth. According to the OECD, tariffs and the global trade war have ramped up uncertainty [1].

A Potential Strategy: Tariffs and Trade Barriers

One potential strategy being considered involves maintaining existing tariffs – perhaps 30% on goods from China and 10% on goods from all other countries. In conjunction, countries would be given a 12-month period to lower non-tariff barriers and further open their economies to international trade.

Did You Know? Non-tariff barriers include quotas, embargoes, sanctions, and other restrictions.These can be just as impactful as tariffs.

The Impact of Extending the Deadline

Extending the deadline by a year could provide a crucial window for both international partners and US domestic businesses to adapt to a new reality of potentially permanent, higher tariffs. This extension could lead to an immediate reduction in uncertainty, which would be beneficial for business planning, employment figures, and the stability of financial markets.

Such a move could be perceived as a win-win scenario. Trade partners might find 10% tariffs acceptable, while the US could generate an estimated $400 billion in annual revenue for taxpayers. This revenue could be used to fund various government programs or reduce the national debt.

Potential Benefits and Unintended Consequences

While the proposed strategy appears promising, it’s essential to consider potential unintended consequences. For example, even with lower tariffs, some businesses might struggle to compete, leading to job losses. Moreover, retaliatory measures from other countries could offset the benefits of increased US tax revenue.

Pro Tip: Businesses should closely monitor trade policy developments and proactively adjust their supply chains and pricing strategies to mitigate potential risks.

Economic Policy Uncertainty and Real GDP

Analysis using a Vector Autoregression (VAR) model, incorporating variables like the log of Real GDP and the log of the Economic Policy Uncertainty Index, reveals a notable relationship. A one standard deviation shock to economic policy uncertainty can lead to an approximate 0.2% decline in Real GDP.

This highlights the importance of stable and predictable trade policies for maintaining economic growth. Uncertainty discourages investment and hiring, ultimately dampening economic activity.

Trump’s Tariff History

President Trump’s previous implementation of tariffs,notably on China,has already had a significant impact. “Reciprocal” tariff hikes on china reached as high as 145%, adding to the existing 25% tariff on specific goods from his first term [2]. These tariffs have contributed to increased costs for businesses and consumers, as well as heightened trade tensions.

Scenario Tariff on China Tariff on Other countries Potential US Revenue Impact on Uncertainty
Current (Speculative) 30% 10% $400 Billion Decrease if deadline extended
Previous (Trump Era) Up to 145% + 25% on select goods Varies N/A high

The WTO’s Warning

The World Trade Organization (WTO) has previously expressed concerns about the impact of Trump’s tariff policies,describing the situation as a “crisis.” The WTO warned that escalating trade tensions could reduce global trade flows, potentially leading to a 0.2% decrease in overall trade volume [3].

What are your thoughts on the potential impact of extending the trade tariff deadline? How can businesses best prepare for the evolving trade landscape?

Evergreen Insights: Trade Tariffs and Global Economics

Trade tariffs have been a tool of economic policy for centuries, used to protect domestic industries, generate revenue, or exert political pressure. Though,they also carry the risk of retaliatory measures and can disrupt global supply chains. The effectiveness of tariffs depends on various factors, including the size of the economy imposing the tariff, the responsiveness of consumers and businesses to price changes, and the reactions of other countries.

Historically, periods of high tariff barriers have frequently enough been associated with slower economic growth and increased international tensions. Conversely, periods of trade liberalization have generally coincided with faster economic growth and greater global cooperation.

Frequently Asked Questions About Trade Tariffs

What are trade tariffs?
Trade tariffs are taxes imposed on imported goods and services. They are typically levied as a percentage of the value of the imported item or as a fixed amount per unit.
Why do countries impose trade tariffs?
Countries impose trade tariffs for various reasons, including protecting domestic industries from foreign competition, generating revenue for the government, and addressing trade imbalances.
What are the potential consequences of trade tariffs?
Trade tariffs can lead to higher prices for consumers, reduced trade volumes, retaliatory measures from other countries, and increased economic uncertainty.
How do trade tariffs affect businesses?
Trade tariffs can increase costs for businesses that rely on imported inputs, reduce demand for exports, and create uncertainty about future trade conditions.
What is the role of the WTO in regulating trade tariffs?
The WTO sets rules for international trade, including limits on the tariffs that countries can impose. The WTO also provides a forum for resolving trade disputes between countries.

Disclaimer: This article provides general data about trade tariffs and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Consult with a qualified professional before making any decisions related to your business or investments.

Share your thoughts in the comments below and subscribe to World today News for the latest updates on global economic trends!


This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others in whole or in part without the express consent of Apollo Global management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

Apollo makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made during this presentation, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of the speaker as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any obligation to update this presentation to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this presentation will continue.

Statements made throughout this presentation are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed during this presentation, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by Apollo.

Certain statements made throughout this presentation might potentially be “forward-looking” in nature.Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

×
Avatar
World Today News
World Today News Chatbot
Hello, would you like to find out more details about Trump Tariffs: A Master Plan or Risky Gamble? ?
 

By using this chatbot, you consent to the collection and use of your data as outlined in our Privacy Policy. Your data will only be used to assist with your inquiry.