Home » Entertainment » The science of being is universal and as such seems to fulfill the claims

The science of being is universal and as such seems to fulfill the claims



2. The science of being is universal and, as such, seems to fulfill the claims
sions that
Analytics
strongly rejected (76 to 16-25, 77 to 26-34). Yes
the science of being was truly a universal and demonstrative science
goes, all the specialized sciences would be subordinate to this science
teacher, but precisely Aristotle rejects a similar subordination
tea. If the book
Gamma
rejects the same subordination, universal science
it cannot be conceived as demonstrative.
3. The science of being discusses the principles that are common to
all
the
sciences and that are presupposed by
each
science. These principles are en-
then principles of the very science of being. Now, in the
Analytics,
Aristotle insists on the fact that no science disputes the truth of
its own principles. If his conception of the proof is applied, Aristó-
Teles is obviously right to forbid each science to defend its
own principles. Therefore, if the science of being defends its own
principles, it is not demonstrative.
4. The science of being discusses the highest and strongest principles of
all (1005 b 5-11). But if we could demonstrate the principles of science
of being from a higher principle, the principles demonstrated are not
laugh the supreme principles already; therefore, they would no longer be the principles
pios of the science of being.
It could still be defended, however, the propaedeutic interpretation
against objections raised by me. Perhaps the non-demonstrative character of
4.
Can we avoid this objection by going to “focal” preaching?
(pros hen) 1
I answer that no;
véase Aristotle’s First Principles,
P. 545, n. 51.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.