Central Administrative Court Brakes procurement of the high-speed train project, the Kaeng Khoi – Klang Dong and Pang Asok – the temporary horse ladder, pointing out the decision of C. Consider the appeal and complaint of the Comptroller General’s Department for BPNP Company Limited to win the auction may be unlawful.
Today (February 25), the Central Administrative Court has ordered to mitigate the procurement process of the Thai-China Railway Project, Contract 3-1 Civil Works for the Kaeng Khoi – Klang Dong and Pang Asoke – Ladders. Cooperation Project between the Government of the Kingdom of Thailand And the Government of the People’s Republic of China In developing a high-speed rail system to connect regions Bangkok – Nong Khai (Phase 1 Bangkok – Nakhon Ratchasima) temporarily until the court gives a judgment or order otherwise, according to China Railway Number Ten Engineering Group Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit. The State Railway of Thailand (SRT), the Government Procurement and Procurement Committee, the Comptroller General’s Department and the Appeal and Complaints Committee, the Comptroller General’s Department, jointly act to change the procurement results. The Thai-Chinese Railway Construction Contract 3-1, in which BPNP Co., Ltd. won the illegal auction. To the Central Administrative Court By requesting the court to issue an order to stay the execution of the order of the Appeal and Complaint Committee, the Comptroller General’s Department
The court argues that Although hearing that BPNP Company Limited is a joint venture that has registered a new juristic person But in bidding according to announcements and electronic tender documents Has required others to present on behalf of “Joint Venture”, which BPNP Company Limited fills in the bidding system as a bidder in the name of “Company” does not fill in information on behalf Therefore, BPNP Co., Ltd. cannot use the construction work of any shareholder in the limited company. To present as their own work BPNP Company Limited has made a proposal by using the construction work of B-Nam Puri SDNBSD Company Limited which the certificate from the project owner is PRASARANA. MALAYSIA BERHD certifies that B-Nam Puri SDNBSD Company Limited is a subcontractor of the joint venture BPHB-TIM SEKATA JV. Without specifying the value of the work But there is only evidence of contract of employment between the main contractor and the subcontractor, so it does not comply with the announcements and electronic tender documents. When the Appeal and Complaints Committee, the Comptroller General’s Department, ruled that the appeal of BPNP Co., Ltd. had heard about the legality of the appeal. The Comptroller General’s department in this class is likely not lawful.
In addition, the project is a bidding process for the construction of the project only part of the route. SRT continues to announce And electronic pricing documents In developing a high-speed rail system to connect regions Bangkok – Nong Khai During other contract work To invite interested parties to bid In this case, it was seen that Has not yet affected the operation cost of SRT in other areas And it is not an obstacle to the administration of the SRT since it has not yet been opened for service to the public using the transport of goods on such rail lines that may affect the public service of the SRT. That this stay in execution Not a hindrance to the administration of the state And does not affect the public service of SRT
– .
