The Family Court in Nasr City decided, today, Thursday, to detain the case filed by the artist Ahmed Ezz, in which he requests the divorced artist Zina to enable him to supervise the educational supervision of his two children, Ezz El-Din and Zain El Din, and transfer them to another school other than those currently enrolled for the March 26th session to pronounce the ruling.
Moataz Al-Dakr, the lawyer of the artist Zina, presented a document that has been folded into the investigations of the detective regarding the wealth of the artist Ahmed Ezz, which includes 12 million pounds of income from one of the series, and also received 20 million pounds from his appearance in one of the ads, in addition to his reward for some of the films and series in which he participated .
He also paid the attorney of the artist, Zina, not to accept the lawsuit because there is no legal basis, indicating that the artist is one of Ezz who possesses wealth and can pay academic expenses for his two children, Ezz El-Din and Zein El-Din..
The Family Court in Nasr City decided, to postpone the hearing of the lawsuit filed by Moataz El-Dakr, the lawyer of the artist Zina against her divorcee, artist Ahmed Ezz, and demanding that she pay the tuition fees for his two children, “Zain Al-Din and Izz Al-Din” for the years 2018 and 2019, with an estimated value of 43 thousand pounds, for the session next March And the lawyer presented at the last session to consider this case a document portfolio that includes investigations about Ahmed Ezz’s fortune.
The Cairo Court of Appeal had previously ruled in favor of the first degree ruling issued to compel Ahmed Ezz to pay the equivalent of 30,000 pounds (700,000 Egyptian pounds) to his two children from artist Zina as school fees for twins..
The Cairo Appeals Court’s decision came as a confirmation of a ruling issued by the Nasr City Family Court, to compel Ahmed Ezz to pay 30,000 pounds of study expenses for his two sons from the artist Zina El Din and Ezz El Din“.
Moataz Al-Dakr was represented by an actress for the artist Zina, and he presented my portfolio of documents, the first Hout, the temporary order issued on October 12, 2016, to prevent Ahmed Ezz from traveling with his children, in which he refused..
The second temporary order, issued on July 24, 2017 in the same matter, in which he also spent rejection, to confirm Ezz’s confirmation of marital, cohabitation, and descent.
Zeina’s lawyer relied, in determining the value of the academic expenses of the artist Ahmed Ezz, to the cinematic work of the defendant, and the size of his wealth, noting that the value of the expenses in foreign currency is due to the fact that the schools that his children enroll in are international schools that are only accepted in foreign currencies.
– .
