New “Reprographic Fee” Set โขto โhit Electronics in Poland, Sparking Controversy
Warsaw, Poland โค- Aโฃ new levy on electronicโ devicesโค in Poland, dubbed a โ”reprographic fee,” is set to come into effect on January 1,โข 2026, sparking debate over its impact onโ consumers, businesses, and the digital landscape. The fee, implemented via a ministerial regulation rather than an act of parliament, is projected to generate upโ to PLN 200 million โขannually, earmarked for distribution to organizations โrepresenting creators.
The move bypasses a 2021 veto byโฃ President Andrzej Duda, whoโฃ refused to sign legislation introducing aโฃ similar fee. The government is now enacting the measure through a regulation issued by the Minister of Culture, circumventing parliamentary debate โand presidential oversight.How the Fee Worksโ & Who Benefits
The fee will be levied on a โrange of electronic devices, effectively acting asโ a โขhidden tax on consumers purchasing items โฃcapable โofโ copying content. โคThe collected funds will beโ distributed among several key organizations:
ZAiKS: Representing authors.
SAWP: Representing performing โartists.
ZPAV: Representing music producers.
ZASP & Association of Polishโ Filmmakers: Representing filmmakers.
Copyright Polska: Representing authors and publishers of pressโ and books.
A portion of the revenue will โฃalso be directed to the โ Social Insurance Fund for Freelancers.
justification & Context:โค A Shift in Consumption
The government argues the โfee is necessary to supportโ creators in aโ rapidly evolving digital surroundings. This comes as dataโ suggests Poland is a strong adopter of legal content consumption. โขA 2024โ report from the Intellectualโ Property โฃOffice indicates Poland ranks highly in โขlegal content usage, with the average Pole accessing illegal content approximately โ8.3 times per month in 2023โ – โa figure lower โthan Romania, germany, and Italy. This suggests a growing โpreference for legitimate streaming โคand purchase options.
Criticism: A “Hiddenโ Tax” & Digitalโ Disadvantage
However, the Economic Freedomโ Foundation strongly โขcondemns โtheโ new regulation, labeling โit “harmful to both consumers and entrepreneurs.” The Foundation argues the fee contradictsโข Poland’s efforts towards โdigitization and โrisks exacerbating digital exclusion. thay contend the โfeeโค is an outdatedโ response to content consumption habits,โ effectively becomingโค a “hidden tax” that will raise prices for consumers and diminish โthe competitiveness โof Polish companies.The concern โstems โฃfrom the original intent of the โ”reprographic fee” – compensating โcreators for unauthorized copying via physical media. Critics argue this model is ill-suited to the current โdigitalโ landscape dominated by streaming services and online purchases.
A Historyโ of Opposition
The โฃattempt to introduce a reprographic fee isn’t new. President Duda’s 2021 veto signaledโค significant reservations about the policy. The government’s decision to implement the fee through a regulation, rather thanโ pursuing legislativeโฃ approval, has drawn criticism for its lack of clarity and public โคconsultation. Opponents argue this approach effectively sidesteps democratic oversight.Sources:
https://www.rp.pl/muzyka-popularna/art42274051-spotify-ujawnia-ile-zarobily-najwieksze-polskie-gwiazdy-w-2024-r
* https://spidersweb.pl/2024/05/23/piractwo-w-polsce-2024/