A Daughter’s Reckoning: Arundhati Roy and theโค Legacy ofโ Her mother
Arundhatiโข Roy’s โฃnew work, a deeply personal exploration of her relationshipโฃ with her mother, reads as a intentional act of self-scrutiny. Aware, perhaps, ofโข the complexities of memory and perspective,โฃ Roy โfocuses intently on understanding her mother,โค seeking out qualities to admire andโข acknowledge.She writes of a woman who possessed a profoundโข self-love: “She loved herself. Everything about herself. Iโ loved that aboutโข her.”
The portrait painted is โฃnuanced, depicting a motherโฃ who was both formidable and distant. Roy describes her as an “unaffectionate iron angel,” โwhose presence, symbolized by the โ”metallic โswoosh of โคher iron wings,” ironically spurred her daughter to confront larger issues rather โthan dwell on minor grievances. This dynamic existed alongside a persistent โขdifficulty in deciphering her mother’s expectations, a feeling of being โคunable “toโ gauge what would โanger my mother and what wouldโค please her.”
The piece evokes a specific Kerala, a world Roy vividly recreates โขthrough observation and memory. Sheโค recalls a societyโ where even gestures of affectionโ were layered with social performance -โค husbands theatrically dropping โฃletters for their wives, adorned with ostentatious displaysโ of wealth โlike “diamonds ‘like tinyโข searchlights’ in their ears.” these observations are interwoven with deeply personal recollections: โa โฃmother liberated before marriage, seen in a sleeveless blouseโฃ and smoking; a father dismissed โas “a Nothing Man”; and a period of โคself-revelation experienced as a โyoungโ woman “alone, and unpregnant” in Rome.
Roy’s evolution as a writer is also traced, from the narrative voice of The God of Small Things to a present-day preference for detailed description โ- a voice โขthat witnessed herโ mother “in ruins” in a coffin and on โtrial, and developed a profound sensitivity to injustice.
published โคnearly three decadesโฃ after her acclaimed โฃnovel, this work feels like a โคdirect address โคto the past. The author herself readโค it in a single sitting, poignantly,โค on the third anniversary of her mother’s death. โIt’s a literary โขachievement โthat carries a weight of sorrow,born from revisiting “Small Things” and holding them up to the light. A passageโ reveals a childhood coping mechanism: “As soon as the shouting โbegan,โ I would โflee. The river was my refuge. It made up for everything that wasโ wrong inโ my life.” this resonates with โa sense of shared experience, blurring the lines between the author and her fictional alter ego, Rahel, as both seem to carryโ the same ache.
Ultimately, the piece resonates powerfully withโ theโฃ experience of motherhood, notably for thoseโ who grapple with the inherentโ contradictions of loving and not fully understanding โtheir daughters, and the ever-present guilt that accompaniesโ that complex bond.