The Paradox of Modern Love: A Look Inside “Materialists“
The new film, “materialists,” explores the complexities of modern relationships, moving beyond a simple “which man will she choose?” narrative to dissect the very nature of connection in a digitally-driven world. While the speaker wasn’t cast in the film, a promising conversation with the director sparked hope for future collaborations. A later,romantic phone call further fueled that connection.
At the heart of the story is Lucy, portrayed as a professional at the peak of her career, yet emotionally detached and driven by perfectionism. She dedicates herself to orchestrating marriages for others, appearing initially as a pragmatic and transactional figure. However, beneath the surface lies a genuine desire for the happiness of those she helps. Lucy is also grappling with a personal crisis: a search for her own fulfillment and a essential question – should she pursue what she thinks she wants, or what she truly needs?
The film utilizes two contrasting male characters to illuminate this internal struggle.According to Celine Song, the director, the intention wasn’t to present a choice between “flavors” of men, but rather to expose the “marketplace of dating” that defines contemporary single life. Lucy, as a skilled matchmaker, understands the dynamics of this marketplace intimately.
One man, played by Pedro, embodies the qualities traditionally considered highly desirable in the dating world – status, wealth, and conventional appeal. The other, portrayed by Chris, represents the opposite end of the spectrum, possessing minimal “market value.” Yet, Song finds both characters deeply endearing and worthy of affection. Lucy is acutely aware of their positions within this “stock market of men,” and the film suggests that this calculated system is on the verge of collapse.
Dakota Johnson, who plays Lucy, acknowledges the discomfort of applying such analytical terms to love. While recognizing the inherent logic of the “marketplace” – a modern echo of historical marriage arrangements based on trade and necessity – she points out the unrealistic expectations placed on modern partners. We now demand our meaningful others fulfill all our needs, a pressure exacerbated by the artificiality of social media and the decline of organic, real-life interactions.
The two men in Lucy’s life represent opposing forces, not just in terms of materialistic value, but also in their potential for emotional and spiritual growth. While one might offer financial security, the other could provide a deeper, more soulful connection. This dichotomy forces Lucy to confront her own desires and priorities. Is happiness found in wealth and status, or in genuine, unconditional love?
Ultimately, “materialists” delves into the contradiction between what we say we want in a partner and how we actually fall in love. The vast chasm between these two realms, Song suggests, is were the film’s central mystery resides. It’s a film that promises to challenge our assumptions about love, connection, and the pursuit of happiness in a world increasingly defined by algorithms and appearances.
“Materialists” opens in cinemas on August 28th.