dailymail

rising Tensions: US Military Buildup and Escalating Rhetoric Towards venezuela

The United States is ‌demonstrating an increasingly assertive posture towards venezuela, ‍marked by a significant military⁣ deployment and increasingly bellicose​ rhetoric‍ from the Trump administration. This​ has⁣ sparked strong ​reactions from Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who alleges a US plot ⁢to invade and destabilize his government.

The US has amassed a substantial military force in the region, including ⁣approximately 10,000 troops, multiple warships, nuclear submarines, F-35 fighter jets, MQ-9 ⁢Reaper drones, P-8 Poseidon reconnaissance planes, and ‍B-52 bombers. This deployment is officially framed as​ a counter-narcotics operation targeting drug-trafficking organizations operating from Venezuela. The USS Gerald R.Ford, the world’s largest aircraft carrier, is ‌among ‌the assets ‍deployed.

Recent actions have further heightened tensions. The​ dispatch of the USS Gravely destroyer to Trinidad and​ Tobago for naval drills, a mere seven miles from Venezuelan territory, drew sharp criticism from Caracas.Venezuela has accused the CIA of collaborating with Trinidad and Tobago ‌to instigate a wider conflict and⁣ claimed to have apprehended a group of “mercenaries” allegedly backed by the CIA, planning a “false flag attack.”

The ⁢situation escalated further ⁢when‍ president Trump informed‌ Congress that ⁣the US is engaged in ‌a “non-international armed conflict.” This designation allows the President to ⁤classify cartel members as “unlawful combatants,” possibly authorizing their killing or indefinite detention without trial. The focus of these actions is primarily on smugglers ⁣operating from‌ Venezuela, a country where the US does not recognize Maduro as the legitimate president.

Maduro has responded by mobilizing tens of thousands of reservists,alleging an imminent US invasion,and broadcasting propaganda portraying Trump as a “bloodthirsty fascist.” Trump himself has issued direct warnings to Maduro, telling him not to “f***‌ around with America.” The administration has also publicly acknowledged authorizing covert ​CIA operations within Venezuela.

These developments have raised concerns among some US lawmakers and legal scholars. They ​question the legal ⁣justifications for the strikes against suspected drug traffickers, particularly the decision to use lethal force instead of apprehension, and the lack of transparency regarding evidence, munitions‍ used, and quantities of drugs seized. Some former military lawyers argue the administration’s explanations do ⁣not meet⁢ the legal ‌requirements for lawful combat operations, including the necessity of​ employing non-lethal methods first.

Furthermore, questions have been raised⁤ about the ⁢involvement of the military in these operations, ⁤rather than the Coast Guard,‌ wich typically handles maritime law enforcement. The⁣ White House has yet to provide detailed ⁣information ‍supporting its ⁢claims against the ⁢targeted vessels ‌and‌ individuals.