What evidence did Envision Racing present in their appeal for Sébastien Buemi?

Envision Racing provided footage from Buemi's roll hoop, photographs showing the cars side-by-side before the apex of the turn, and telemetry data indicating that buemi maintained control throughout the maneuver.

How did the stewards rule after reviewing the new evidence regarding Sébastien Buemi's penalty?

After reviewing the additional evidence, the stewards determined that no party was primarily at fault for the incident between Sébastien Buemi and Edoardo Mortara.

What was the outcome of Envision racing's appeal on Sébastien Buemi's finishing position?

Consequently of the successful appeal, Sébastien Buemi was reinstated to his original third-place podium finish at the Jakarta E-Prix.

How does Sébastien Buemi's reinstated podium finish affect his standing in the Formula E championship?

With the podium finish reinstated, Sébastien Buemi moved up to 10th place in the Formula E championship standings for the 2024/25 season.

What was the result of Nissan's appeal against Oliver Rowland's penalty?

The FIA rejected Nissan's appeal against the penalty given to Oliver Rowland, determining that the additional evidence provided was not new.

Sébastien Buemi Reinstated to Jakarta E-Prix Podium After Appeal

Q: Why was Sébastien Buemi initially penalized at the Jakarta E-Prix?

Sébastien Buemi received a penalty due to a late overtaking maneuver that resulted in contact with Edoardo Mortara, forcing Mortara off the racing line and causing him to lose position.

Table of Contents

Sébastien Buemi Reinstated to Jakarta E-Prix Podium After Appeal

Sébastien Buemi has been reinstated to his third-place podium finish at the Jakarta E-Prix after a successful appeal by Envision Racing. New evidence swayed stewards to overturn a previous penalty levied against Buemi for an incident with Edoardo Mortara.The decision elevates Buemi to 10th in the Formula E championship standings.

Appeal Overturns Penalty for Jakarta E-Prix Incident

The initial penalty stemmed from a late overtaking maneuver by Buemi on Mortara, resulting in contact that forced Mortara off the racing line, costing him a position. Following the race,Buemi was demoted from third to eighth place. Envision Racing, however, lodged an appeal within the 96-hour deadline stipulated by the International sporting Code.

The appeal included new evidence not initially available, such as footage from Buemi’s roll hoop, photographs demonstrating the cars were “side by side” before the turn’s apex, and telemetry data indicating Buemi maintained control throughout Turn 13. This additional information proved crucial in the stewards’ reconsideration.

Did You Know? The International Sporting Code allows teams to appeal decisions within a specific timeframe, provided they can present new and relevant evidence.

Stewards Reassess Incident, Find No Party Primarily at Fault

A hearing was convened with representatives from both Envision Racing and the opposing team, along with testimonies from Mortara and Buemi. After reviewing the new evidence, stewards concluded that no single party bore primary responsibility for the incident. This decision effectively rescinded Buemi’s penalty and reinstated his podium finish.

Buemi now celebrates his second podium of the 2024/25 season, following his earlier victory in Monaco. This result substantially boosts his championship standing.

Pro Tip: Teams frequently enough utilize various data sources, including onboard footage and telemetry, to build a strong case for appeals in motorsport events.

Rowland Penalty Upheld Despite nissan’s Protest

In a contrasting outcome, a protest lodged by Nissan regarding a penalty assessed to Oliver Rowland was rejected by the FIA. Rowland received a 5-second penalty for a similar incident involving Maximilian Günther. The stewards determined Rowland made a late overtaking maneuver approaching Turn 13, hitting Günther’s front right tire and forcing him into the wall, leading to Günther’s retirement. Despite Nissan’s submission of additional evidence, the FIA deemed the information not new and upheld the original penalty.

The FIA’s decision highlights the stringent criteria for successful appeals, emphasizing the need for genuinely new and compelling evidence.

Formula E Championship Standings Impact

The contrasting outcomes of these appeals underscore the critical role of evidence and the FIA’s rigorous review process in Formula E. While Buemi benefits from the overturned penalty, Rowland’s penalty stands, impacting the championship leader’s points haul.

Driver	Team	Position Change
Sébastien Buemi	Envision Racing	From 8th to 3rd (Jakarta E-Prix)
Oliver Rowland	Nissan	Penalty Upheld

What are your thoughts on the FIA’s decision to overturn Buemi’s penalty? How do you think this will affect the rest of the Formula E season?

Evergreen Insights: The nuances of motorsport Appeals

Motorsport appeals are a complex process governed by the International Sporting code. Teams must adhere to strict deadlines and provide compelling new evidence to challenge decisions made during a race. The burden of proof lies with the appealing team to demonstrate that the original ruling was incorrect based on information not available at the time. Successful appeals can have significant implications for championship standings and team morale.

Frequently Asked Questions About Formula E Penalties and appeals

What is the standard procedure for issuing penalties in Formula E?

Penalties in Formula E are typically issued by race stewards who review incidents during the race. These penalties can range from time penalties to drive-through penalties, depending on the severity of the infraction.
What types of evidence are typically used in formula E appeals?

Teams frequently enough use onboard camera footage, telemetry data, and witness statements to support their appeals. The key is to present new information that was not available to the stewards during the initial ruling.
How long do teams have to file an appeal in Formula E?

According to the International sporting Code,teams generally have 96 hours from the end of the race to file an appeal.
What factors do stewards consider when reviewing an appeal?

Stewards consider whether the evidence presented is new, relevant, and compelling enough to overturn the original decision. They also assess whether the original ruling was consistent with the regulations and previous rulings.
Can a driver testify during an appeal hearing?

Yes, drivers involved in the incident are often called to testify during the appeal hearing to provide their perspective on what occurred.

Stay informed about the latest developments in Formula E! Share this article and join the conversation in the comments below.

Berlin ePrix I

Buemi Jakarta E-Prix: Penalty Overturned, Podium Reinstated