Despite the fact that Mr. Tsipras explained to the recent Central Committee that in SYRIZA “we will not engage in meaningless disagreements with PASOK and other parties of the left”, his former adviser Mr. Karteros attacks Mr. Androulakis with derogatory characterizations.
It is not the first time that the journalist criticizes the president of PASOK. Last March, he commented on the position of Mr. Androulakis “neither Mitsotakis, nor Tsipras” with an article entitled “Is Androulakis a bouzouki?”, while a year earlier he called him a “useful idiot”.
And then SYRIZA accuses PASOK of a one-sided attack against it. (Part I)
They have completely escaped
They must have broken the counters of logic in SYRIZA.
The attacks against PASOK are escalating every day.
The Syrian media discovered yesterday that there was a “Commotion with the buttonhole Androulakis – The president of PASOK with a pistol in a closed space” and circulated a video of N. Androulakis, from PASP Xanthi in 2007, in which he was supposed to be throwing punches.
Harilaou Trikoupi assures that it was not a real weapon, but a Halloween celebration.
The same Syrian media did not hesitate and …condemned Androulakis because in a photo of the time he is with a cigarette in his mouth!
And then SYRIZA accuses PASOK of a one-sided attack against it. (Part II)
That goes too
It closes with the will of the Council of Misdemeanors Novartis case concerning the company executives who had been accused of bribing politicians and doctors.
In the order, issued more than seven years after the start of judicial investigations into the practices of the pharmaceutical industry, the judges of the Council rule that the then senior executive of the Greek division of the company, Konstantinos Frouzisthe professor Nikos Maniadakis and their three co-accused, executives of the parent company Novartis, did not commit the act of joint bribery in succession and direct cooperation in the said offense “with regard to the 10 political persons investigated for the performance of passive acts under them of bribery either as suspects or accused”.
Look how the biggest scandal since the foundation of the Greek state ended!!!
The revolution of Haris
Haris Kastanidis rebelled because Nikos Androulakis kept the seat in A’ Thessaloniki and left him out of Parliament.
In his statement, he found that we are living in an “era of the decline of politics” and added about his eviction: “In the symbolic and moral field it is of great importance, for reasons that are understood only by those who have a historical consciousness of the space.”
Look who’s talking, I thought, and I went back a bit on the political track of the rebel.
What historical consciousness Grace?
What historical consciousness of space?
Mr. Kastanidis was deleted from PASOK by Giorgos Papandreou himself, in 2012, together with others, who voted against the second memorandum and the PSI.
In March 2012, Haris Kastanidis founded together with Louka Katseli the party “Social Accord” to damage PASOK.
They failed miserably in the elections in May 2012 (0.96%).
In the June 2012 elections, they supported SYRIZA.
Therefore, they damaged PASOK again.
In August 2013, Haris Kastanidis “flirted” with Kouvelis and joined the now anti-memorial DIMAR.
In 2015, he responded to the call of Papandreou (who had deleted him) and joined KIDISO.
With the aim of damaging PASOK again.
With the processes that began in 2017 for the unity of the space, under Fofis Gennimatas, Mr. Kastanidis was reunited with PASOK.
In other words, when the democratic world was suffering, from 2012 onwards, to save the homeland from destruction, Mr. Kastanidis was on the other side.
And today you invoke “historical awareness of space”.
Let’s not go crazy Harry.
The bet
If Nikos Androulakis decides to leave Haris Kastanidis out of Parliament for just one day (as he implied), it is his right, but it does not symbolize anything.
It will symbolize something if he leaves him out for good, choosing the seat of Thessaloniki again.
This is a bet Androulakis is making with himself: to show if he has the leadership stuff to produce politics in a symbolic field as well, that is, to dare to clear away anti-memorial populism.
A chance to see who possesses the historical memory of “the space” and which side they will choose.
And Dawn in the middle
We watched the rampage that took place in SYRIZA because Mr. Kastanidis was left out of Parliament.
“Serious questions about Androulakis’ decision to “eat” Kastanidis”, wrote “Avgi”, and furious attacks on PASOK followed.
They did not even comment on the fact that Tsipras left Dritsa out of Parliament, eliminating another member of the Group of 53, the left-wing component of SYRIZA.
It is what we say that he does not see his own hump but looks at others.
Turn to seriousness with Marantzidis
I understand that SYRIZA is attempting a “turn to seriousness” ahead of new elections. First, it picks up the idiots from the channels and imposes face control on who gets to talk. Justified. But where will seriousness be found?
Let’s borrow some from someone serious, was probably the reasoning.
So they chose professor Nikos Marantzidis, for the political planning of the pre-election campaign, next to the president Alexis Tsipras.
He had been approached to join Epikratias as well, but he refused (he was replaced by Akrita – but then they weren’t “serious” yet).
