Oslo — April 28, 2025 — A Department of Defense analysis has accused the Right-Wing party of engaging in systematic falsehoods regarding defense strategy, according to a new report. The report alleges that the Right party misrepresented defense policy, especially prior to 2013. The Right party has strongly refuted these claims,calling them politically motivated. For more information from the report, read on.
Defense Analysis Accuses Right-Wing Party of “Systematic Falsehoods”
Table of Contents
A new analysis from the Department of Defense Studies has ignited a political firestorm, accusing the Right party of engaging in systematic falsehoods
regarding defense policy. The Right party has vehemently rejected these claims, setting the stage for a contentious debate.
Key Claims of the Analysis
- The analysis alleges that the Right party misrepresented the state of defense prior to assuming government office in 2013.
- It further asserts that the right party continued the defense policies of the preceding Stoltenberg government, despite campaign rhetoric suggesting or else.
- The report points to specific instances where claims made by the Right party are allegedly not supported by factual data from 2009-2016.
There is talk of a selection – there are far more examples,
the analysis states, implying a broader pattern of misinformation.- The analysis claims that several of the claims have been
repeated also manny years after the period that has been put into focus.
Did you know?
Defense spending is often a contentious issue in political debates, with parties frequently using statistics and projections to support their arguments. Understanding the nuances of defense budgets requires careful scrutiny of both past data and future plans.
Right Party Responds: “Political Play”
Ine Eriksen Søreide, who previously chaired the Foreign and Defense Committee and served as Minister of Defense during the period examined in the analysis, has strongly criticized the report. Currently, she is back as chair of the same committee.
The article contains a number of errors and has a selective use of history and quotes.
Ine Eriksen Søreide
Søreide views the timing of the analysis, just months before parliamentary elections, as politically motivated.
When the opposition is wrongfully accused of lies, it can hardly be seen as anything but a political play, four months before the parliamentary elections.
Ine Eriksen Søreide
She also expressed concern over an official within the Ministry of Defense making such accusations against a single party.
Pro tip
When evaluating political claims, always cross-reference details from multiple sources. Look for independent fact-checking organizations and academic studies to verify the accuracy of statements made by politicians and government officials.
The Core Argument: Continuity vs. Change
A central contention of the analysis is that the Right party’s narrative of a declining defense prior to their taking office in 2013 is not supported by numerical evidence. The analysis further suggests that the Solberg government, led by the Right party, largely continued the defense policies of its predecessor.
Shouts Warning
The analysis raises concerns about the potential erosion of factual accuracy in political discourse.
Confidence and democracy depend on politicians who consistently speak true… In Norway, too, there is a need for thorough factual checks of what is conveyed from a political point of view.
