CONCLUSIONS
During their conclusions, the candidates have a minute or less to speak.
Danielle Simmonnet wants a “Paris of mutual aid, a Paris that breathes”. She insisted on “framing and lowering rents, free transport, inserting a universal guarantee for people below the poverty line”.
Serge Federbush completely rejects the policy of the outgoing mayor. “Those who no longer want Anne Hidalgo’s policy must give themselves the means.” He proposes to “ensure that there is no crapoteux arrangement behind the backs of Parisians”, on questions of traffic or housing in particular.
The candidate LR Rachida Dati warns her about an election which is “quits or double: either we save Paris, or we condemn it to decline”.
David Belliard lists the “exceptional” challenges, both ecological and economic, that face Paris. He promises to implement solutions to make “Paris more accessible”, to “stop with all-waste”. “We are fully committed so that ecology is not just a word,” he concludes.
Buzyn again attacks Anne Hidalgo. “Paris has been mistreated and mismanaged”. We need an “alternative for Paris”. It prioritizes safety, environmental cleanliness and solidarity
Outgoing mayor Anne Hidalgo asks: “Who do you want to entrust the future of your city to?”. She warns: “There is a real risk of going backwards, we have heard this evening. Those who deny the ecological emergency, those who believe that ecology is punitive those who do not want to do social housing “.
At the end of the debate, Cédric Villani calls on him to “bet on the audacity to change the air with the possibility of building this new page”.
– .
