Home » Sport » Purple for a movie star? Erroneous, the fee reported

Purple for a movie star? Erroneous, the fee reported

Ousou received a yellow card for shoving substitute Musa Alli, but after the intervention of the movie referee (VAR) and watching the replays, referee Klíma improved the first verdict and the match finished prematurely for the checking out defender at the 57 ‘. According to the minutes of the match, Klíma despatched Ousou off for thwarting an noticeable scoring possibility. Slavia manager Jindřich Trpišovský mentioned following the match that he experienced hardly ever seen a pink card for such an action. The Pragueers led by 3 goals at the time of the disqualification and, in spite of staying weakened, they received 4: .

“Although the attacker was the very last defender and the attacker would have sophisticated on your own on the goalkeeper, but as the attacker was shut to the purpose line and would have been at the goalkeeper from a disadvantageous angle, yellow card for disturbance a promising action would have been enough punishment in this circumstance From an evaluation position of watch, this is a complicated predicament for the referee and the VAR, “the referee panel reported in a statement.

Photograph: Václav Šálek, CTK

David Douděra of Slavia and goalkeeper Martin Berkovec of Brno.Image: Václav Šálek, CTK

Even with the unfair disqualification, Ousou is unlikely to stay clear of a match suspension. The Disciplinary Fee of the Lega Calcio does not study cases in which the referee need to have assigned a diverse card for an infraction. The fee commonly “forgives” the player only if the referee misses the participant or the intervention does not materialize at all. Slavia will confront Teplice at residence in Wednesday’s intermediate round.

Spartan stopper Asger Sörensen, on the other hand, in the Prague derby on Saturday with Bohemias 1905 (1: 1), rightly gained only a yellow card from referee Pavel Orl for capturing the “Klangaros” striker David by the shorts. Puskáč on the run 29 ‘to Letná.

“Even though the participant who committed the foul was the past defender at that time, the infringement transpired in the vicinity of the boundary line and it was probably that the attacker would have to endure yet another battle with the defender, who was more absent from the aim line as opposed to the time attacker, but he had a much better advantage in the heart of the playing region, “explained the fee, introducing that it was also a hard condition for the referee and the VAR from the level of evaluative watch.

The fee also supported most important referee Marko Radin, who in Sunday’s duel concerning Slovácko and Liberec outfitted household group Vlastimil Daníček for a foul on the escaped Jan Matoušek in the initially half. In this scenario, it was a loss of an evident scoring possibility. Slovan received 2: 1 in Uherské Hradiště with a numerical advantage.

“Even though the defender’s assault took location in his individual half, the attacker clearly state-of-the-art by itself on the goalkeeper, the other defenders could hardly avert him mainly because of their situation. From an evaluation stage of watch this is a clear condition for the goalkeeper. referee, “explained the arbitration fee.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.