| ▲ In addition, Democratic Party representative Lee Nak-yeon is declaring continuation at the Supreme Council meeting held at the National Assembly on the 15th. | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo | |
“The polarization inherent in our economy and society is spreading deeper and wider as we suffer from corona,” said Nak-yeon Lee, CEO of the Democratic Party. “The corona benefit-sharing system is to find a solution for mutual mutual assistance.”
The opposition party, as well as Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun, have checks on the profit-sharing system proposed by him, but it is read as a means of breaking through. Lee, who is usually reluctant to directly criticize the opposition party, criticizes the public’s power as “socialist, but the Lee Myung-bak administration, which promoted the excess profit-sharing system, and the Park Geun-hye administration, which implemented the corporate income return tax system, are socialism. “I don’t.”
Representative Lee said at the Supreme Council’s meeting held at the National Assembly on the day, “With Corona 19, the polarization phenomenon is rapidly progressing in various areas such as employment income and assets.” “In the bottom 20% to 30%, income fell to the middle class in the fourth quarter.”
He added, “As we worked on quarantine with a spirit of community, we need to deal with the economy and polarization with a spirit of community to achieve better results,” he said. “Please promptly deliberate on relevant laws at the competent standing committee (Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy) I ordered.
Representative Lee Nak-yeon also set up an angle with the opposition party, taking the case of the Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye governments. “The opposition party condemns the profit-sharing system as being socialist,” Lee said. “The Lee Myung-bak administration promoted the excess profit-sharing system, and the Park Geun-hye administration implemented the corporate income return tax system.” In addition, he emphasized, “The US, the United States, which is an advanced capitalist country, the UK’s Rolls-Royce, and Japan’s Toyota have also achieved effective results through the concept of a profit-sharing system.”
Jeong Sye-gyun “Another Conflict Factor”… Lee Jae-myeong “Benefit rather than efficiency”
 |
|
| ▲ From left, Nak-yeon Lee, representative of the Democratic Party, Gyeonggi Governor Lee Jae-myeong, and Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun. | |
| Ⓒ Oh My News | |
Although President Lee Nak-yeon’s arrow was aimed at the opposition party, his pain is criticism within the party. Democratic Party lawmaker Lee Sang-min (Daejeon Yooseong) said, “I agree with the purpose of Lee Nak-yeon’s benefit-sharing system, but voluntary participation is not guaranteed to be effective,” and “There is also a risk of (government) pressure or control donation.” I made the opposite position.
Democratic Party lawmaker Lee Yong-woo (Gyeonggi-do Yang-jeong, Gyeonggi-do), former co-representative of Kakao Bank, also criticized “I emphasize spontaneity in the profit-sharing system, but I doubt that it will be true.”
The presidential election runners in the party are also speaking differently from Lee. Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun, who caught the recent decline in the approval rating of Lee Nak-yeon as an opportunity, appeared on the tbs radio’Kim Eo-jun’s News Factory’ on the 14th and said, “I do not use the term (profit-sharing system) itself.” “Another source of social conflict “It can be.”
Gyeonggi Gyeonggi Governor Lee Jae-myeong responded to the meeting with reporters at the National Assembly on the 14th, saying, “Because it is a very urgent and difficult time, it would be’good faith’ to do everything possible rather than’efficiency’.” They raised questions about the effectiveness of the benefit-sharing system.
[관련 기사]
Jae-Myung Lee “Profit-sharing system, good faith rather than efficiency” http://omn.kr/1rowj
“Profit-sharing system? Is the country Robin Hood?” http://omn.kr/1rm5t
– .
