Suara.com – A Muslim leader India a flood of criticism after filing a petition in the Supreme Court to remove more than 20 verses from the Koran because they are deemed not original
Adapt Times Of India, Wednesday (17/3/2021) Wasim Rizvi filed a petition in India’s Supreme Court requesting the removal of 26 clauses of Al-Qur’an.
“These verses were added to the Qur’an, by the first three caliphs, to aid the expansion of Islam through war,” explained Waseem Rizvi, who is the former chairman of the Uttar Pradesh Shiite Endowment Council.
“After (Prophet) Muhammad, the first caliph of Hazrat Abu Bakr, the second caliph of Hazrat Umar and the third, namely Hazrat Usman, released the Koran as a book,” he continued.
Also Read:
Desperate to be single, Mansuri asks the police to help find a mate
Rizvi in his petition also said that the 26 verses provoked violence and incited people to jihad.
The petition immediately angered the public and Muslim leaders in India and condemned Rizvi’s actions, which were deemed to have hurt Muslim sentiment.
The All India Shia Private Law Council and many other Muslim organizations have condemned Rizvi’s actions and asked the Supreme Court to reject the petition.
“Muslims will not accept any debate about the authenticity and truth of the verses of the Qur’an.” clearly the council.
“None of Hazrat Imam Ali, the first Shiite imam, to Imam Hussain or any other imam has ever doubted the truth of the verses of the Qur’an,” he said.
Also Read:
Starting from a stomachache, this grandfather ate stones for 32 years
Secretary General of the Shia Personal Law Council and spokesman for Maulana Yasoob Abbas said Rizvi was only spreading disputes.
“He was quoting out of context and trying to spread the dispute. The Supreme Court should immediately throw the petition away,” he said.
Secretary General of the All India Muslim Personal Law Council Maulana Mahmood Daryabadi said not a single word in the Koran has been changed over the past 14 centuries.
“The Supreme Court must immediately disperse the petition. There is no verse of the Koran that provokes people to commit violence. Wasim Rizvi quoted those verses out of context,” said Daryabadi.
Activist Abbas Kazmi said Wasim Rizvi did this to create a rift between Shia and Sunnis.
“No Shia has ever said that there is any interpolation in the Quran. We believe this is the book that was revealed,” said Kazmi.
Prince Arcot, Nawab Mohammed Abdul Ali, said that the petition had to be dismissed immediately because it was unclear. “That absurd, reckless and annoying petition deserves to be dismissed in the first place,” he said. The Hindu.
“There is not a single verse in the entire Qur’an that promotes violence or terrorism, if read in the proper context,” he explained.
Prince Ali also explained that “the Koran condemns violence and unjustifiable terrorism, while allowing self-defense”.
“Only the reading of deviant verses that go out of context can lead to a completely wrong view, as expressed by Waseem Rizvi,” Prince Arcot said.
Prince Arcot said the court was not the right forum or body to decide which verses were allowed or deleted from a religious book.
“This will be a serious disturbance in the religious beliefs of the people concerned affecting their right to religious freedom. If any court accepts such a petition, tomorrow may be faced with a similar petition to remove verses from religious books and the holy books of religious communities. other, “said Prince Arcot.
– .
