“Identifying the propensity of a judge and placing it in a specific court is like an attempt by a person in charge of manipulating the results of the trial.”
On the 9th, the incumbent vice-president judged the figures of the chief judges of the first and second trial courts recently conducted by Chief Justice Kim Myung-soo. The front line judges are attracting social attention, such as the so-called “suspicion of abuse of judicial administration power” and the allegation of the former Justice Minister Cho Kook’s family. It is raising suspicion that it has been achieved.
● Judges’ complaints about “Insa Nongdan” grow
“This greeting is the most problematic part of what happened in the regime of Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo,” said the vice-president judge working at the courts in the metropolitan area. did. A high-ranking judge at the head of the court pointed out that “Insa nongdan” took place to derive specific results of the trial. The deputy judge of the Seoul Central District Court said, “The reason there have been no great doubts or criticisms regarding the placement of the judicial unit so far is because people have accepted the premise that all judges are independent and conduct a fair trial. . There is also a view that each court should pay close attention to how the division of work will eventually come out. A deputy judge of the Finance and Economy Law said, “Now we have to see which judicial judges are assigned to each judge in the court.” “It’s a big problem if the Cheong Wa Dae’s Ulsan mayor’s election intervention suspicion will be tried.” A judge of the Seoul Central District Court said, “It is true that Deputy Judge Kim remains in the court unusually, but it may change from the division of work that will be decided after the Lunar New Year holiday.”
● Supreme Court Justice Researcher Personnel Controversy
Photo newsis– In the Supreme Court, controversy also arises over the greetings of judges who have been appointed as judges. Deputy Judge A, who is known to be close to Chief Justice Kim, worked as a judge at the’Supreme Court of Kim Myung-soo’ and then moved to a court in the metropolitan area, and returned as a judge of the Supreme Court. In 2018, Deputy Chief Judge B, who tried to be dispatched to an external agency, decided that the agency would no longer receive judges, and was dismissed, was appointed as a Judge Research Officer. Judge B is known to have served as a distribution judge when Supreme Court Chief Kim served as a front-line court. Inside and outside the Supreme Court, there is a saying, “Aren’t judges close to Chief Justice Kim returning to the Supreme Court?”
However, inside the court, it seems that it will not be easy for judges to raise personnel issues to Supreme Court Chief Kim under their real name. One judge said, “I still don’t know how this was greeted. It is only guessing at the will of the person in charge,” he said. “It is difficult for young judges to raise problems.” Another reputable person said, “You may be disadvantaged for posting criticism in your real name.” The Seoul Court of Justice Yoon Jong-gu posted on the court’s internal network on the 5th that the Supreme Court Chief Kim did not accept the resignation of the Busan High Court chief judge Im Seong-geun on the grounds of the National Assembly’s impeachment discussion. The chief judge himself deleted the article.
Reporter Eunji Wi [email protected]
Reporter Park Sang-joon [email protected]Go to reporter page>
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
—
–
