-Attorney Park Joon-young, who investigated the suspicion of sexual hospitality at the villa of the former vice minister of Justice Kim Hak-eui by the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office’s historical fact-finding team, criticized Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae and Professor Jeong Han-joong regarding the allegations of illegality in the process of banning Kim from leaving.
In addition, he expressed the position that it is difficult to accept the situation in which the first and second investigations against former Vice Minister Kim were unconditionally wrong, and the situation of discussing the legitimacy and due process of the emergency ban on departure.
On the 18th, attorney Park said on his SNS on the 18th, “If I am faced with an unfair thing, I hope that someone who knows the facts will not be silent.” “It is too unfair to continue receiving criticism beyond the part of his responsibility. The reason I am arguing for the neighbors,” he wrote.
He wrote down questions that criticized him regarding the first and second investigations against former Vice Minister Kim, the investigation of the fact-finding team of the prosecution’s past, and the court ruling, and then drew the title of’Population for North Koreans’. For example, in relation to fact-finding in the past in 2018 and 2019,’what was the facts investigation team and past son-in-law’s thinking before the President’s thorough investigation order?”Evidence of former Vice Minister Kim’s charges in an investigation request after the emergency departure ban It is a way of asking questions such as’what is it?’. “I will not answer the reporters’ calls. Report on the basis of the information mentioned above,” he added. Attorney Park posted a post titled “The progress of the related situation” on his Facebook late in the afternoon of the previous day (17th). He wrote, “Minister Chu Mi-ae, you don’t seem to know the situation at the time of the investigation request, the details of the investigation request, and the investigation process of the investigation team”. “Please listen carefully to the situation at the time from the officials of the investigation team and decide whether to continue advocating.
Attorney Park, well-known as a lawyer specializing in review, was in charge of investigating the case of ΔBrother Uniform Support ΔPD Handbook ΔKBS President Jeong Yeon-joo during the activities of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Past Photographic Investigation Team, and came out of the investigation team while investigating Kim Hak’s case.
Earlier, Minister Chu said on the 16th, “The’future withdrawal of former vice minister Kim’ is not a genuine apology for the investigation of the prosecution against him, but a derogation of past son-in-law activities and a legitimate re-investigation.”
Attorney Park said, “There was no basis for the ban on the departure of former Vice Minister Kim,” he said. “And because he blocked his departure in the name of criminal investigation, he had no choice but to ask for an investigation. And because it was’emergency’ banned from leaving the country, I was forced to request an investigation immediately.”
“However, there was no suspicion of making an investigation request. He pointed out that the unprepared investigation request was very poor, and the large-scale investigation team that was organized as an investigation request would have had no choice but to be absurd.” He pointed out that if he could not arrest or prosecute former Vice Minister Kim, the investigation team had no choice but to assume the responsibility. .
He also said, “Although former Vice Minister Kim was partially guilty in the second trial, the fact of the convicted crime was not a problem at all at the time of the emergency departure ban.” “As the investigation team was confused by the insolvent and absurd request of the fact-finding team, It was a charge that I searched and found,” he added.
In connection with the controversy over the illegal departure ban against former Vice Minister Kim, Mr. Park also made a bitter voice at Han-jung, the president of the Law School of Korea University of Foreign Studies, and Kim Nam-guk, a member of the Democratic Party.
On the 17th, director Jung said, “Is the investigation of the immigration ban procedure serious and urgent enough to put five prosecutors in,” and said, “While watching the disciplinary record of Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol, he decided that he had to warn them. I expected that there would be.”
On the same day, on his Facebook prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol’s assignment to Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office of Kim Hak’s ban on departure was suspected of being a’retaliation investigation’ for photographing prosecutors who did not stand on his side. It was a false investigation,” he claimed.
At the same time, he said, “I think it is too irresponsible for the command of the great swordsman to watch this situation at that time,” and repeatedly urged former President Moon Moo-il to talk about it in March 2019.
Attorney Park addressed President Jung, who served as the chairman of the Past History Committee, saying, “The reason for refusing to extend the period of activity on March 12 (2019) and the reason for extending the activity after 6 days, and in the process, “It would be nice if we could reveal any changes in circumstances related to the former vice minister case and talk about retaliation.”
Rep. Kim said, “The great prosecutor did not want to be involved in the investigation of the fact-finding team,” he emphasized. “I wasn’t able to say that I was afraid to hear stories that intervening in such a matter would interfere with the fact-finding investigation. Does it make sense to talk now?”
Attorney Park said, “I am willing to reveal all the incidents that occurred because of my greed among the incidents that occurred during the investigation, such as the Yakchon 5-geori incident, the Samrye Nara Super incident, and the Nakdong Riverside murder incident that were the subject of investigation in the past. He added, “It’s not a’MINISTRY OF JUSTICE’!”
(Seoul = News 1)
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
—
–
