“It is a very personal decision to judge the artist through his work or involve his intimate life”

From the outset, he assured that “cancel” it is a determination that each person can see in their own way and it is completely valid. “I think it is a very personal decision to cancel an artist or not. Judge the artist through the work or involve his personal life ”, she declared, saying that for her it was “very easy to eliminate Michael Jackson from my life and leave it completely canceled, but I have never been able to cancel Woody Allen. My moral compass depends on how much I like the artist’s work and whether I am willing to judge him through the work or through him“, He explained in conversation with Radio ADN. “It is difficult to take a position, because I have this internal conflict,” he added.

And, in the middle of awards season, he stated that the personal life of the artists does influence to define their nomination or not in some decoration. “I think criticism is influenced by the fact that certain actors, directors, characters, etc. are accused, and it has not always transcended. There is a nomination for Dr. Luke this year at the Grammys, and in fact Fiona Apple wanted to boycott the Grammys, because there is Dr. Luke, who had been accused by Kesha and changed his name.

Along these lines, he stated that it is necessary to know how to distinguish the seriousness of the events in which artists are involved. “I think there are harder and stronger thingsI think there are people who have had severe problems in their lives. addictions, who have also had erratic behaviors because of that. Now, they are prizes for art, not for conduct ”.

Rafael Sarmiento: “We are all imperfect and I think we have learned along the way”

Another recognizable voice from each award ceremony on TNT is that of Rodríguez’s partner in each transmission: Rafael Sarmiento, who also expressed his position on the issue through the case of Sean Connery, stating that period differences are also an important factor.

“The man died and social networks were dedicated to destroying him because in the year ’64 he made a statement for Playboy Magazine saying that it was not wrong to slap a woman if the fight was not transcending. Let’s see, is it wild? Yes. Unpresentable? totally unpresentable. But it was 1964. I think we had neither the consciousness about violence against women, nor feminism, nor equality rights, nor civil and social rights that we have now. You have to put everything in the context in which it was developed. Not because of a statement made by the man in 64 are you going to end four decades of legacy, “said the journalist.

“It is a very complicated subject. I think there are things that I accept and things that I don’t. The other day a friend on Facebook, who is a radio host for a rock station in Mexico, asked: Do feminists listen to the Rolling Stones? And it was armed. There were 500 messages because it was a very complicated topic, very complex, very controversial. It is delicate, but I do believe that you cannot put everyone in the same basket, “he added.

On the importance of the artist’s intimate life for the development of his career, he stated that “in some way, the work has to be separated from the person, because if we dedicate ourselves to reviewing the social network, life, parents, we are left without writers, without musicians, without filmmakers, without friends, “he said.

“We are all imperfect and I think we have learned along the way. We have reeducated ourselves, we have become aware of things “, he closed.

– .