Pakistan Parliament Condemns Israel’s Attack on Iran, Citing International Law Violations
Table of Contents
- Pakistan Parliament Condemns Israel’s Attack on Iran, Citing International Law Violations
- Parliamentary Condemnation of Israeli Aggression
- Pakistan’s Solidarity with Iran
- Demands for International Action
- Evergreen Insights: Background, Context, and Historical Trends
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Why did Pakistan’s parliament condemn Israel’s attack on Iran?
- What specific actions did the Pakistan parliament call for after the attack?
- How did Pakistani officials describe Israel’s actions?
- What was Pakistan’s stance on Iran’s right to self-defense?
- What concerns were raised about the Muslim world’s response to the conflict?
international laws and UN conventions.">
Islamabad,pakistan – In a unanimous decision,both houses of the Pakistani parliament passed resolutions on Friday,June 13,2025,strongly condemning Israel’s military attack on Iran. The resolutions declared the attack a violation of international laws and United Nations conventions, escalating tensions in an already volatile region [[2]].
Parliamentary Condemnation of Israeli Aggression
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar presented the resolution in the Senate, while Syed naveed Qamar, head of the Pakistan-iran parliamentary friendship group, introduced it in the National assembly. The resolutions unequivocally denounced Israel’s actions as a “war crime” and a “blatant violation” of the UN Charter and international norms.
Did You Know? The UN Charter,signed in 1945,outlines the basic principles of international relations,including the prohibition of the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.
The Senate resolution expressed deep concern over the “slaughter of children and civilians in Gaza” over the past two years, criticizing the Muslim world’s inaction, which it suggested emboldened Israel to attack Iran.The National Assembly echoed these sentiments, noting that the strikes on june 13, 2025, violated Iran’s sovereignty and integrity, contravening international law [[1]].
Pakistan’s Solidarity with Iran
The resolutions reiterated pakistan’s unwavering solidarity with the government, parliament, and people of Iran. The parliamentarians emphasized Iran’s right to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter, which recognizes the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a member of the United Nations.
Former Prime minister Raja Parvaiz Ashraf stressed that condemnations alone were insufficient, advocating for practical measures to defend Iran. Sahibzada Hamid Raza, Chairman of the sunni Ittehad Council (SIC), labeled Israel a “terrorist state,” a statement that resonated with many members of parliament.
Key Figures Weigh In
Federal Minister Rana Tanveer Hussain asserted that Israel poses a “serious threat to world peace,” while PTI’s Barrister Gohar Ali Khan described the attack as a “tragic incident of history.” Speaker Ayaz Sadiq stated, “We do not recognize Israel as a state,” reflecting Pakistan’s long-standing policy.
Pro Tip: Understanding the historical context of the Israel-Palestine conflict is crucial for grasping the complexities of the current situation. resources like the Council on Foreign Relations provide in-depth analysis.
Demands for International Action
The parliamentarians called on the Pakistani government to immediately request meetings of the UN Security Council and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) to address the aggression against Iran. The goal is to secure international condemnation and an immediate cessation of hostilities.
| Organization | Action Requested |
|---|---|
| UN Security Council | Discuss and condemn the aggression against Iran |
| Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) | Discuss and condemn the aggression against Iran |
The resolutions serve as a strong statement of Pakistan’s position on the conflict, highlighting its commitment to international law and solidarity with Iran. The long-term implications of this parliamentary action remain to be seen, but it underscores the growing tensions in the Middle East [[3]].
What steps should the international community take to de-escalate tensions between Israel and Iran?
How might this conflict impact regional stability and global security?
Evergreen Insights: Background, Context, and Historical Trends
The relationship between Israel and Iran has been fraught with tension for decades, stemming from ideological differences, geopolitical competition, and conflicting regional interests. Iran does not recognize Israel as a legitimate state and has historically supported groups hostile to Israel, such as Hezbollah and Hamas.Israel, in turn, views Iran’s nuclear program and regional ambitions as a important threat to its security.
The current conflict is rooted in a series of escalating events, including alleged Israeli strikes on iranian targets in Syria and Iranian-backed attacks on Israeli interests. the recent attack condemned by pakistan’s parliament represents a significant escalation,raising concerns about a wider regional war.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Pakistan’s parliament condemn Israel’s attack on Iran?
Pakistan’s parliament condemned the attack, viewing it as a violation of international law, the UN Charter, and the sovereignty of Iran.They also expressed concern over the impact on regional peace and security.
What specific actions did the Pakistan parliament call for after the attack?
The parliament urged the Pakistani government to immediately convene meetings of the UN Security Council and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) to discuss, condemn, and halt the aggression against Iran.
How did Pakistani officials describe Israel’s actions?
Various Pakistani officials and parliamentarians described Israel’s actions as a “war crime,” a “heinous crime against the Muslim Ummah,” and a “serious threat to world peace.”
What was Pakistan’s stance on Iran’s right to self-defense?
The national Assembly emphasized Iran’s right to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter, reiterating Pakistan’s solidarity with the Iranian government, parliament, and people.
What concerns were raised about the Muslim world’s response to the conflict?
The resolution regretted the perceived inaction of the Muslim world regarding the ongoing conflict in Gaza, suggesting it emboldened Israel to attack Iran. Some members stressed that mere condemnations were insufficient and called for practical measures to support Iran.
Share your thoughts: how should the international community respond to this escalating conflict? Subscribe to World Today News for continuous updates.
