Home » Business » Indiana Shooting Case: Lawyer Argues Justified Use of Force

Indiana Shooting Case: Lawyer Argues Justified Use of Force

by Priya Shah – Business Editor

Black Indy LIVE – defense Attorney Outlines Strategy in ⁤Shooting Death of Cleaning Worker

A recently released⁢ public‍ statement from defense attorney ​Guy Relford is providing the first detailed insight into the legal​ defense of 56-year-old Curt Andersen in the shooting death of 34-year-old Maria Florinda⁣ Rios Perez de Velasquez.

Relford, representing Andersen, intends to argue that Andersen was ​legally justified in using deadly force against Perez de‌ Velasquez inside‍ his Boone County home. The defense will center on the claim that Andersen “reasonably believed” ​Perez was unlawfully entering his residence, and that deadly force ​was “fully justified” under Indiana’s Castle Doctrine -⁣ the state’s stand-your-ground law.

The case gained widespread attention ​online after it emerged that ​Perez ⁣de​ Velasquez was unarmed,employed as a cleaning worker,and reportedly known to Andersen through the cleaning company.

Relford’s statement asserts that Andersen’s actions are‌ being unfairly⁣ scrutinized based on facts unavailable to him ‌at the time ⁣of ⁣the shooting, and that the jury should focus solely on what Andersen believed at the moment, rather then subsequent police findings.

The Boone County Prosecutor has charged Andersen with involuntary ⁢manslaughter, a decision met with meaningful public outcry from ⁤community members who feel the charge​ is insufficient‌ given the circumstances of Perez de Velasquez’s death while performing her job.

the case has garnered national attention as prosecutors prepare to present their argument against the applicability of the Castle Doctrine. ​A press conference is anticipated, and the trial is expected to be‌ a closely followed⁣ legal event in Indiana.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.