Sunday, December 7, 2025

Historic Mistake: Brazil Opens Amazon to New Oil Drilling Amid Climate Summit

‘Historic Mistake’: Brazil greenlights‌ Amazon oil Drilling, Sparking Outcry Ahead⁢ of COP30

Belém, Brazil – In a move condemned ⁤by environmental groups and scientists, Brazil’s environmental agency, IBAMA,⁣ has approved a ⁢controversial ‌license for oil​ drilling⁢ in the Amazon River’s mouth, just months before ⁤the nation hosts ⁣the​ 30th United⁤ Nations Climate Change conference (COP30). ⁢The decision,⁢ announced October 20, 2025,⁢ has been labeled⁣ a‌ “historic mistake” and is ⁣expected to face legal challenges.

the Climate Observatory stated the ⁢approval “sabotages” COP30, which World Meteorological Association Secretary-General Celeste Sauro recently described as a potential “turning point” – a ⁣moment when ⁢the ‍world⁤ moves “from ambition to implementation.”

The license ​allows for exploration and potential extraction ⁢by state-owned oil⁢ company Petrobras in ⁢the Foz ‍do‌ Amazonas ‌basin, ⁢a highly sensitive marine ecosystem. This decision‍ comes as the world grapples with escalating climate impacts; last year​ marked the first time global average temperatures exceeded 1.5°C ‍above pre-industrial levels, and the ‍past decade ⁢has been ⁤the warmest on record.​ Scientists and ⁢the‍ International Energy Agency have repeatedly warned ‍that no new fossil⁤ fuel​ projects are⁣ compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C and achieving net-zero emissions‌ by ⁤2050.

“The decision is disastrous from an ​environmental, climate, and sociobiodiversity viewpoint,” the Climate Observatory declared. The group ​confirmed it will ‌pursue legal action against the⁢ Brazilian government, ⁣alleging “illegalities and technical flaws” in the ⁤approval ​process.

Internal‍ dissent ⁣within IBAMA ⁣itself underscores the concerns. An​ opinion signed by 29​ agency staff members in February recommended denying the ⁤license, citing the risk of “massive biodiversity loss” in the region.

Environmental advocates point to ⁢the potential for devastating consequences. Greenpeace International co-head ​of story and communications, ⁣Nick Young, ​called the decision “disastrous,” warning that “a spill here would be catastrophic ‌and uniquely hard to contain in the Amazon plume.” He added,”And in addition to the risk ⁢of oil spills,the science clearly shows that we cannot afford to ​burn​ even existing‌ oil reserves,let ‌alone​ new ones. For us‌ all to have a future, the oil industry can ⁣have‌ no future. It makes zero sense to allow them to find new oil⁣ to throw on‌ the ⁢fire.”

The move also ⁣flies in ⁣the face of⁤ demands ‌from Indigenous leaders, representing dozens of‍ Amazon ​ethnicities and tribes, who earlier this year signed ⁢a declaration calling for the “nullification ‌of oil blocks that have not had the consent of Indigenous people,” a “halt [to] investment in new oil infrastructure,” and⁤ the creation of phase-out ⁤plans for​ existing⁣ oil and gas operations, specifically ⁢ahead of COP30.

Zugman, a spokesperson for the Climate ‌Observatory, echoed these concerns, stating, “The ‍history of oil in Brazil shows this clearly: huge ⁣profits for ⁣a few, and inequality, ⁢destruction, and violence for local‌ populations. Brazil ​must take real climate leadership and break the cycle ‍of extraction that has led us to the current ⁤climate crisis. We urgently need‍ a just​ energy transition ‍plan, ⁢based ⁤on renewables, that ​respects Indigenous,⁤ quilombola, and ⁢riverside peoples and guarantees them a⁢ leading role in decisions about climate and energy-including at ⁤COP30.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.