Home » Entertainment » Guardianship of Britney Spears: Why does the most famous popstar of today remain under her father’s domination? | For women

Guardianship of Britney Spears: Why does the most famous popstar of today remain under her father’s domination? | For women

  • July 9, 2021 | 06:00

    One of the most famous stars of world pop music, and not only the tabloid media for decades, the continuously watched singer Britney Spears (39) has been legally under the guardianship of her father James Parnell Spears since 2008 – for 13 years. How did such a situation come about and what fatal consequences does it have not only on the career but also on the personal life of this singer?

    If you are not currently a Britney rock fan or do not regularly watch the media, here is a brief summary of the situation. After several allegedly involuntary hospitalizations in connection with her mental state in 2008, Britney has been legally deprived of her rights – her property, financial and personal affairs has been in charge of her father James Parnell Spears ever since. It seems to be skyrocketing that, at the time of this ruling, almost no one had raised an eyebrow at the impact of guardianship on Britney’s life and, above all, whether it was in place at all.

  • What exactly is guardianship?

    Britney with partner Sam Asghar


    To clarify – guardianship (in English “conservatorship”) is a legal provision for the case when a person is in a mental or physical state, when he is unable to take care of himself and his loved ones, dispose of his property and make other important life decisions. At such a moment, he is deprived of his right and his property and power over his life are entrusted to the person called, logically most often to one of his closest relatives. In practice, such a procedure is commonly encountered in elderly people suffering from dementia, Alzheimer’s disease or severe physical illnesses. In these cases, it is a situation that should be mainly for the benefit and facilitation of the life of a person who is deprived of his or her right to self-determination. But was he – and still is – on the spot at the then 32-year-old world-famous popstar, millionaire and mother of two?

  • Britney’s mental state – how was it really?

    Britney’s sons Sean Preston and Jayden


    The details of Britney’s mental state, which has worsened significantly since 2007, of the hospitalizations and subsequent lawsuits that led to Britney Spears’ father’s custody of his daughter, are described in great detail in the documentary Framing Britney Spears from February this year, and is definitely the best starting point for those who want to learn as much as possible about the history of these events. The fact that Britney’s mental health seems to have been lacking for a long time is demonstrable, but the question is whether it was and still is a really serious condition that her guardianship would be necessary.

    Many celebrities suffer or have suffered not only from mental problems, but also from alcohol and drug addictions. In the context of their lives, however, it is not surprising. On the one hand, they will gain success, fame and floods of money, on the other hand, they will lose a large part of their privacy and the opportunity to live their personal and family life in peace. The constant presence of the paparazzi, the tabloid press that won’t leave them dry, and the inability to go out in sweatpants for coffee, for example, without staring at them from strangers and camera viewfinders. It is quite natural that living under such extreme pressure will take a long-term toll on some celebrities in the form of a worsened psyche or addiction. There have been many during history. Some ended tragically, others struggled with their problems, others still struggle to this day. But will any of us remember a celebrity who would be deprived of his or her legitimacy because of these problems?





    Cup and celebrities • VIDEO: Whoopdedoo CZ

    Fun Personality Tests: What does the shape of your nail or foot reveal?  10 tests for you

  • Protection or cold-blooded calculus?

    Britney during her show in Las Vegas, 2016


    Yet here we have Britney, who has lived in such a disaster for thirteen years. Although she is continuously able to produce albums with millions of copies sold, make music videos and go on world tours, take care of her two little boys and on her own, the court found her incapable of handling her own money, traveling at the instigation of her father and the team around him. , buy or manage real estate, freely contribute to their social networks or get married and have children. Yes, you are not really misled – Britney does not even have the opportunity to decide whether to have other offspring. As she admitted in her speech at the last trial from two weeks ago, she has an intrauterine device in place that prevents her from getting pregnant and which she cannot have removed. Although, as she herself said, she would like to marry her current partner, personal trainer Sam Asghari, (27) and have a child with him, she has no right to do any of the above. Among other things, Britney talked about the fact that she can’t even choose her own therapist.

    You ask, how is it possible that a woman who can handle as much personally and professionally as Britney is incompetent? So you probably ask yourself exactly the same question as the whole world, which has been closely following the case of her guardianship, especially since the release of the aforementioned documentary Framing Britney Spears. If the singer is fully competent to work and earn millions, she will probably not be so mentally ill that she will not be able to decide on her personal life or how and when to spend the money she earns. So the answer is that behind Britney’s legal condition is not the goodwill of her father, who wanted to help his daughter in trouble, but rather his desire for the power and financial exploitation of Britney, about whom – as well as her siblings – He had never shown much interest before.

    Cosmetic news for the month of July, with which you will enjoy the summer

  • Britney with her parents James and Lynne


    If we look at the history of the Spears family, we very quickly find out that Britney’s father was definitely not a loving father who would stand by Britney’s side in her ups and downs. Her father James and mother Lynne Spears divorced when Britney was still young, and she and her younger siblings remained in her mother’s care. She completed the path to fame with her from an early age. Her father did not fully return to the “stage” of Britney’s life until later, when she was a worldwide success star. As soon as the turbulence associated with the boulevard, which was constantly on its heels, and the crisis of her mental state, arose in her life, James took the initiative very quickly, and before Britney continued, she was legally deprived of the opportunity to decide freely about her life. Her money, when she will record her next album, when and how she will tour, where she will live, and even her physical and mental health issues – all this has been in the hands of her father for the last thirteen years.

    If it weren’t for the million-dollar empire that Britney built with her talent and hard work, it would seem that from her father’s point of view, there was not much to care about in terms of guardianship. Who without side intentions would like to decide every step of their own and long-grown daughter? Money and power are certainly a strong motivator in such a case, and it seems that this is exactly the goal of Britney’s father James. Because Britney has been placed in custody under the pretext of an unstable psyche, he is free to dispose of the money she has earned. She also manages Britney’s life so that she remains a well-functioning money machine. That’s why Britney can’t have another husband or children, why she can’t decide on her own treatment, or even speak for herself on her social networks.

    Incredible changes: See how women have changed thanks to the stylist

  • Support for fans and the #FreeBritney movement

    Fans protesting against Britney’s custody


    Britney Spears has lived as a puppet in the hands of her own father for the past eight years, and although she has not had much opportunity to speak publicly about her problems, she has resisted in recent years, along with her fans and supporters of the #FreeBritney movement – just like a podcast Britney´s Gram. The trial two weeks ago, in which Britney called for the abolition of custody and for the restoration of her right to be independent, brought great hope. In the already mentioned speech, which is in full length to listen to here, with obvious sadness in her voice, spoke not only about her desire to extend her life to her husband and another child, but also, for example, about the impossibility of choosing her therapist. Britney said that according to her father’s decision, she had to go to therapy in an extremely exposed part of Los Angeles, where paparazzi are constantly waiting for her. When she comes out – like many other people – crying out of therapy, her unflattering photographs are regularly taken, which are just more ammunition in the hands of her father and others who need to prove to the world that the singer is constantly mentally unstable and incapable of normal functioning. Because of this, Britney does not feel well about the therapy, so the treatment brings her more sadness and stress rather than help and improvement.






    Help yourself to the beauty of food: What beauty tricks with food work?


    Moisturizing Mists and Spray Water: Why Do You Definitely Need Them During the Summer?

  • A verdict we are not satisfied with


    However, even after this emotional speech, Britney finally rejected her request for custody last week. Although the news is unfortunate, it is rumored that it was only a formal step to allow Britney’s case to be properly re-investigated. However, these are unofficial reports that have not yet been confirmed by any of the competent authorities. Britney Spears thus remains under her father’s administration with all her existence, and unfortunately regaining basic human freedom is for her the music of the future. We can only hope that Britney and her legal team will continue their liberation efforts and that her case will continue to receive the attention she deserves – and he did in the years when we, as a society, overlooked this iniquity.

    Due to its tragic fate, Britney has become a modern symbol of years of oppressed women. Although it might seem that women in the hands of men are a thing of the distant past, the case of Britney and her father proves that even in the 21st century it is quite possible to subdue a very successful woman, and moreover completely legally. It was enough – as in many centuries before – to call her mentally unstable, and so someone else, a “more professional” man, her father, could take control of her life. This whole case should therefore lead not only to the liberation of Britney, but also to a general reflection on whether women’s rights are truly unlimited today and whether women are not only equal to men before the law. It is no secret that “psychological instability” has long been used against women in court proceedings, even in the fight for child custody and property settlements, and often leads to completely fatal and unjust convictions. However, the time has come when we should finally define ourselves as a society against compromising women on the basis of their emotional processes.

    10 famous fathers: Which descendants are their faithful copy?

    The modern elixir of youth: What is the use of miraculous collagen?

  • – .

    Leave a Comment

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.